空间异质性建成环境对出租车与地铁竞合关系的影响

doi:10.16097/j.cnki.1009-6744.2022.03.004

交通运输系统工程与信息 ›› 2022, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (3): 25-35.DOI: 10.16097/j.cnki.1009-6744.2022.03.004

• 综合交通运输体系论坛 • 上一篇下一篇

空间异质性建成环境对出租车与地铁竞合关系的影响

陈启香¹，吕斌^{* 1}，陈喜群²，郝斌斌¹，何佳曦¹

1. 兰州交通大学，交通运输学院，兰州 730070；2. 浙江大学，建筑工程学院，杭州 310058

收稿日期:2021-12-25 修回日期:2022-02-20 接受日期:2022-02-22 出版日期:2022-06-25 发布日期:2022-06-22
作者简介:陈启香(1988- )，女，甘肃白银人，讲师，博士生。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金;甘肃省优秀研究生“创新之星”项目;甘肃省教育厅双一流重大科研项目

Impacts of Built Environment on Competition and Cooperation Relationship Between Taxi and Subway Considering Spatial Heterogeneity

CHEN Qi-xiang¹ , LV Bin^*1, CHEN Xi-qun² , HAO Bin-bin¹ , HE Jia-xi¹

1. School of Traffic and Transportation, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou 730070, China; 2. College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China

Received:2021-12-25 Revised:2022-02-20 Accepted:2022-02-22 Online:2022-06-25 Published:2022-06-22
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China(61463026, 61463027)；Department of Education of Gansu Province: the Excellent Postgraduate Student "Innovation Star" Project (2021CXZX- 560)；"Double-First Class" Major Research Programs, Educational Department of Gansu Province(GSSYLXM-04)。

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 建成环境对出行方式的影响已有丰富的研究成果，然而对不同出行方式间相互关系影响的研究仍不够细致。本文以网格化的形式细化研究区域，采用土地利用属性和交通属性的六小类要素作为特征变量刻画城市建成环境的特征。基于出租车行程的OD点与地铁站点的空间关系，将出租车与地铁竞合关系表征为 SCPE(Subway-competing,与地铁竞争)方式、SE(Subwayextending，延伸地铁)方式和SC(Subway-complementing，补充地铁出行)方式，并利用多尺度地理加权回归研究建成环境对竞合关系(SCPE、SE、SC)的影响机理及其空间效应。针对兰州市的案例研究表明：SCPE、SE、SC方式具有显著的空间异质性；多尺度地理加权回归能够刻画SCPE、 SE、SC方式与建成环境间依赖关系的空间异质性及其尺度差异，其估计结果更为可靠；建成环境各要素对SCPE方式的影响较为平稳，SC方式对公交站点密度和道路密度要素非常敏感，存在高度的空间异质性，SE方式亦对公交站点密度要素非常敏感。

关键词: 城市交通, 竞合关系, 多尺度地理加权回归模型, 出租车GPS数据, 建成环境

Abstract: This study investigates the impact of built environment on the relationship between taxi and subway considering spatial heterogeneity. The study area is divided into grid cells and six subcategories of transportation system attributes and land use system attributes are selected as variables to describe the characteristics of urban built environment. The competition and cooperation relationship between taxi and subway are defined as SCPE (subwaycompeting), SE (subway-extending), and SC (subway-complementing) based on the spatial relationship of origin/ destination of taxi trips and subway stations. The multi-scale geographic weighted regression model (MGWR) is used to analyze the influence mechanism and spatial effects of built environment on the coopetition relationships (SC, SCPE, SE). The case study of Lanzhou city shows that the SC, SCPE and SE have significant spatial heterogeneity. The MGWR can characterize the spatial heterogeneity and scale difference between the coopetition relationship and variable dependencies and produce a more reliable estimate result. Moreover, the spatial impact of the built environment elements on the SCPE mode is relatively stable. The SC mode is closely related to bus stop density and road density, and there is high degree of spatial heterogeneity. The SE mode is also closely related to bus stop density.

Key words: urban traffic, competition and cooperation relationship, multi-scale geographically weighted regression;taxi Global Positioning System (GPS) trajectory data, built environment

中图分类号:

TU984

陈启香, 吕斌, 陈喜群, 郝斌斌, 何佳曦. 空间异质性建成环境对出租车与地铁竞合关系的影响[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(3): 25-35.

CHEN Qi-xiang , LV Bin , CHEN Xi-qun , HAO Bin-bin, HE Jia-xi. Impacts of Built Environment on Competition and Cooperation Relationship Between Taxi and Subway Considering Spatial Heterogeneity[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2022, 22(3): 25-35.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: http://www.tseit.org.cn/CN/10.16097/j.cnki.1009-6744.2022.03.004

http://www.tseit.org.cn/CN/Y2022/V22/I3/25

参考文献

[1] 尹超英, 邵春福, 王聘玺, 等. 基于多层模型的城市建成环境对通勤行为的影响[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2018, 18(2): 122-127. [YIN C Y, SHAO C F, WANG P X, et al. Impacts of built environment on commuting behavior based on a multilevel modeling approach[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems and Engineering and Information Technology, 2018, 18(2): 122-127.]

[2] KLINGER T. Moving from monomodality to multimodality? Changes in mode choice of new residents [J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2017, 104: 221-237.

[3] 黎秋平. 基于时空数据可视化的出租车与地铁竞合关系研究[D]. 深圳: 深圳大学, 2020. [LI Q P. Research on the relationship between taxi and metro based on spatiotemporal visualization[D]. Shenzhen: Shenzhen University, 2020.]

[4] YE Y W, SUN J, LUO J. Analyzing spatio-temporal distribution pattern and correlation for taxi and metro ridership in Shanghai[J]. Shanghai Jiaotong University Press, 2019, 24(2): 137-147.

[5] JIANG S X, GUAN W, HE Z B, et al. Exploring the intermodal relationship between taxi and subway in Beijing, China[J]. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 2018, 2018(3): 1-14.

[6] HUANG J W, LIU X T, ZHAO P X, et al. Interactions between bus, metro, and taxi use before and after the Chinese Spring Festival[J]. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 2019, 8(10): 445-463.

[7] TU W, CAO R, YUE Y, et al. Spatial variations in urban public ridership derived from GPS trajectories and smart card data[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 2018, 69: 45-57.

[8] 高德辉, 许奇, 陈培文, 等. 城市轨道交通客流与精细尺度建成环境的空间特征分析[J/OL]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(6): 25- 32. [GAO D H, XU Q, CHEN P W, et al. Spatial characteristics of urban rail transit passenger flows and fine-scale built environment [J]. Journal of Transportation Systems and Engineering and Information Technology, 2021, 21(6): 25-32.

[9] 甘佐贤. 建成环境对城市轨道交通客流及出行特征的影响机理研究[D]. 南京：东南大学, 2019. [GAN Z X. Impact of built environment on the passenger flows and transfer behavior of urban rail transit[D]. Nanjing: Southeast University, 2020.]

[10] SUN J, PENG Z R, SHAN X F, et al. Development of web-based transit trip-planning system based on serviceoriented architecture[J]. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2011, 2217(1): 87-94.

[11] 古恒宇, 孟鑫, 沈体雁, 等. 中国城市流动人口居留意愿影响因素的空间分异特征[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75 (2): 240-254. [GU H Y, MENG X, SHEN T Y, et al. Spatial variation of the determinants of China's urban floating population's settlement intention[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2020, 75(2): 240-254.]

[12] QIAN L, CHUAN D, PENG C. A panel analysis of the effect of the urban environment on the spatiotemporal pattern of taxi demand[J]. Travel Behaviour and Society, 2020, 18: 29-36.

[1]	李婉莹, 关宏志, 韩艳, 曹杨柳. 社会偏好视野下旅游出行服务链定价博弈模型[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(4): 11-22.
[2]	陈鹏, 唐鹏, 闫伟曦, 孙秋月. 无信控路段人行横道处行人过街建模与仿真[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(4): 79-88.
[3]	李同飞, 曹雅宁, 窦雪萍, 熊杰, 许琰, 周文涵. 面向新型混合交通流的智能交叉口网络布局优化[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(4): 302-312.
[4]	蒋阳升, 俞高赏, 胡路, 李衍. 基于聚类站点客流公共特征的轨道交通车站精细分类[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(4): 106-112.
[5]	袁红霞, 徐菱, 严余松, 江文辉. 基于改进两步移动搜索法的轨道交通接驳可达性分析[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(4): 113-119.
[6]	刘明敏, 何鸿杰, 金安. 给定站点条件下轨道交通线网初步辅助构建模型[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(4): 120-128.
[7]	朱顺应, 廖凌云, 吴景安, 常红光, 王红. 城市客运交通工具碳排放效率差异——以襄阳市为例[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(4): 158-166.
[8]	冯海霞, 王兴渝, 咸化彩, 刘新华, 李健, 宁二伟. 城市交通运行状况对机动车碳排放的影响研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(4): 167-175.
[9]	刘家林, 贾斌, 刘正, 姜锐, 李新刚. 多模式疏散交通车队配置与车道分配协同优化研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(4): 176-185.
[10]	吴静娴, 钱依楠, 韩印. 考虑群体异质性的建成环境与老年人慢行出行关系研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(4): 194-201.
[11]	李君羡, 沈宙彪, 童文聪, 吴志周. 基于模糊时序网络的城市路网关键交叉口识别方法[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(4): 202-209.
[12]	谢良惠, 张真继, 宫大庆. 面向城市轨道交通的启发式疫情密接人群追溯方法[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(4): 218-227.
[13]	王晓宁, 崔梓钰, 张玉. 考虑交通环境影响的封闭小区开放决策研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(4): 228-235.
[14]	杨亚璪, 唐浩冬, 彭勇. 考虑偏好差异的后疫情时代居民出行方式选择行为研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(3): 15-24.
[15]	陈光会, 姬浩, 靳富强, 郭清娥, 贾斌, 苏兵. 考虑能源类型的城市出租车运营效率评价研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(3): 36-44.

空间异质性建成环境对出租车与地铁竞合关系的影响

Impacts of Built Environment on Competition and Cooperation Relationship Between Taxi and Subway Considering Spatial Heterogeneity

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics