首页 | 官方网站   微博 | 高级检索  
     

高速铁路CFG桩复合地基现场试验对比研究
引用本文:朱明,吴耀宗.高速铁路CFG桩复合地基现场试验对比研究[J].路基工程,2010,0(4):91-93.
作者姓名:朱明  吴耀宗
作者单位:西南交通大学土木工程学院,成都610031
摘    要:结合现场试验,研究了柔性基础下采用CFG桩帽网复合地基和CFG桩桩板复合地基的工作性状,并对二者的地基沉降和桩土应力比进行了对比分析。试验结果表明:复合地基帽网比桩板的沉降大;CFG桩复合地基桩土应力比随着荷载增加而增大,当加载结束后,桩土应力比趋于平缓;稳定后,帽网复合地基的桩土应力比为516,荷载分担比为62 %,桩板复合地基的桩土应力比为663,荷载分担比为79 %;CFG桩桩板结构的整体特性优于桩帽结构。

关 键 词:CFG桩    桩网结构    桩板结构    复合地基    沉降    桩土应力比
收稿时间:2019-11-06

Comparative Study on CFG Pile Composite Foundation of High-speed Railway Based on Site Test
Authors:ZHU Ming  WU Yao-zong
Affiliation:(School of Civil Engineering,Southwest Jiaotong University,Chengdu 610031,China)
Abstract:Combined with site test,this paper studies the performance of CFG pile-net reinforced composite foundation and CFG pile-slab reinforced composite foundation under flexible base,and carries out comparative analysis on foundation settlement and pile soil stress ratio.It is indicated from the result that pile-net reinforced composite foundation has heavier settlement than pile-slab reinforced composite foundation;pile soil stress ratio of CFG pile composite foundation increases with the increase of load;after it is loaded,pile soil stress ratio trends to milden;after stabilized,pile soil stress ratio of pile-net composite foundation is 5.16 and load sharing ratio is 62 %;for pile-slab composite foundation,they are separately 66.3 and 79%.Therefore,the overall performance of CFG pile-slab structure is better than that of pile-net structure.
Keywords:CFG pile  pile-net structure  pile-slab structure  composite foundation  settlement  pile soil stress ratio
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《路基工程》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《路基工程》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司    京ICP备09084417号-23

京公网安备 11010802026262号