首页 | 官方网站   微博 | 高级检索  
     

送风形式对飞机座舱引气污染物扩散影响
引用本文:杨建忠,马博文,陈希远,王振斌.送风形式对飞机座舱引气污染物扩散影响[J].交通运输工程学报,2019,19(1):108-118.
作者姓名:杨建忠  马博文  陈希远  王振斌
作者单位:1.中国民航大学 适航学院,天津 3003002.中国民航大学 天津市民用航空器适航与维修重点实验室,天津 300300
基金项目:民用飞机专项科研项目MJ-2014-J-73中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目3122018D034
摘    要:采用联合仿真方法实现了飞机环境控制系统对座舱环境的调节, 建立了飞机环境控制系统到座舱环境闭环仿真模型, 研究了考虑再循环风时不同送风形式对引气污染物在座舱内乘客呼吸区域传播的影响; 以B737-200座舱模型为研究对象, 分析了引气污染发生时相同供气量与不同再循环风比例下, 天花板送风、侧壁送风、混合送风下污染物在呼吸区的分布情况。研究结果表明: 在污染物进入座舱阶段, 不同送风形式与再循环风比例下不同位置污染物浓度存在差异, 天花板送风形式下污染物浓度较大; 再循环风比例每增加20%, 混合送风、侧壁送风、天花板送风形式下污染物浓度分别降低约18.9%、20.6%、15.6%, 侧壁送风形式下污染物浓度降低最多; 在污染物排除阶段, 侧壁送风形式相较于混合送风和天花板送风形式下排污效率分别提升约42.6%和38.7%;采用混合送风或天花板送风形式时, 随着再循环风比例的增加, 排污效率显著提升, 再循环风比例每增加20%, 混合送风和天花板送风排污效率分别提高约10.7%和7.7%;侧壁送风形式下随着再循环风比例的增加, 排污效率无明显提升, 在较高再循环风比例仍可保持最好的排污效率, 能够实现污染物排除和节能的双重优化。可见, 飞机座舱引气污染事件发生时在不改变送风量情况下采用侧壁送风形式和高再循环风比例可以使污染物危害降到最低。 

关 键 词:航空运输    飞机座舱    污染物传播    联合仿真    再循环风比例    排污效率
收稿时间:2018-09-10

Influence of air supply form on contaminat diffusion of bleed air in aircraft cabin
YANG Jian-zhong,MA Bo-wen,CHEN Xi-yuan,WANG Zhen-bin.Influence of air supply form on contaminat diffusion of bleed air in aircraft cabin[J].Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering,2019,19(1):108-118.
Authors:YANG Jian-zhong  MA Bo-wen  CHEN Xi-yuan  WANG Zhen-bin
Affiliation:1.School of Airworthiness, Civil Aviation University of China, Tianjin 300300, China2.Tianjin Key Laboratory of Civil Aircraft Airworthiness and Maintenance, Civil Aviation University of China, Tianjin 300300, China
Abstract:The co-simulation method was adopted to realize the adjustment of aircraft environmental control system to cabin environment. The closed-loop simulation model of aircraft environmental control system to cabin environment was established. The effects of different air supply forms on the propagation of airborne contaminant in the passenger breathing area were studied under considering recirculating air. Taking B737-200 cabin model as the research object, the distributions of contaminant in the breathing area under the ceiling, sidewall and mixed air supply modes were analyzed under the same air supply quantity and different proportions of recycled air when air contamination event occurs. Research result shows that in the state that the contaminant enter the cabin, the concentrations of contaminant in different air supply forms and the proportions of recycled air are different at different positions, and the concentration of contaminant in ceiling air supply form is higher. When the proportion of recycled air increases by 20%, the concentrations of contaminant in the forms of mixed air supply, sidewall air supply and ceiling air supply decrease by about 18.9%, 20.6% and 15.6%, respectively, and the contaminant concentration decreases most under the form of sidewall air supply. In the contaminant removal stage, compared with the mixed air supply and ceiling air supply, the contaminant removal efficiency of sidewall air supply increases by about 42.6% and 38.7%, respectively. When using the mixed air supply or ceiling air supply, the contaminant removal efficiency increases significantly with the increase of the proportion of recycled air. When the proportion of recycled air increases by 20%, the contaminant removal efficiencies of mixed air supply and ceiling air supply increase by about 10.7% and 7.7%, respectively. With the increase of the proportion of recycled air in the form of sidewall air supply, the contaminant removal efficiency is not significantly improved. At a higher proportion of recycled air, the best contaminant remove efficiency can still be maintained, which can realize the dual optimization of pollutant removal and energy saving. Therefore, the use of sidewall air supply and high recycled air ratio can minimize the harm of contaminant without changing the air supply volume. 
Keywords:
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《交通运输工程学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《交通运输工程学报》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司    京ICP备09084417号-23

京公网安备 11010802026262号