共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 109 毫秒
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
针对红岩金刚车全浮式驾驶室悬置系统的损坏和隔振差情况,对该车型进行道路试验,测试驾驶室的平顺性,并分析驾驶室悬置的隔振性能,最后通过对悬置的力学计算分析提出整改方案,建立三维模型进行装配可行性分析,并最终在整车上试装成功.此测试、分析、计算方法可供重型车驾驶室悬置工程师参考. 相似文献
6.
针对红岩金刚车全浮式驾驶室悬置系统的损坏和隔振差情况,对该车型进行道路试验,测试驾驶室的平顺性。并分析驾驶室悬置的隔振性能,最后通过对悬置的力学计算分析提出整改方案。建立三维模型进行装配可行性分析。并最终在整车上试装成功。此测试、分析、计算方法可供重型车驾驶室悬置工程师参考。 相似文献
7.
8.
9.
笔者曾在此前多个文献中分别研究了半挂牵引车全浮式驾驶室悬置系统平顺性和悬置参数优化性问题,并进行了驾驶室悬置系统刚柔性限位能力分析,为全浮式驾驶室悬置系统设计提供了有意义的参考。驾驶室悬置弹簧在一些特殊情况下可能会存在失效的可能,项目委托企业需要了解在悬置系统失效的情况下驾驶室的安全性问题。因此,本文面向驾驶室安全性问题建立了全浮式驾驶室主体结构非线性有限元分析模型,并分别针对驾驶室后悬置失效、前悬置失效和模拟跌落冲击的情况,对驾驶室进行了动态仿真分析,得到了结构的应力和变形,分析了结构失效的部位和形式,并提出了改进设计建议,为企业掌握其产品的安全性能提供了所需的参考。 相似文献
10.
11.
为研究车‐路系统耦合作用下汽车行驶平顺性,运用车辆动力学仿真软件CarSim建立整车模型,并采用傅里叶逆变换法对 GB7031中规定的A~D级路面进行数值仿真与验证,分析了车辆以不同速度行驶在不同等级路面上的加速度和车轮法向动载系数。结果表明:①随着路面等级的降低和车辆行驶速度的提高,车身加速度显著增大,由50 km/h、A级路面上的0.2599 m/s2变化为120 km/h、D级路面上的1.6889m/s2,增加了5.5倍,车辆行驶平顺性下降;②车‐路耦合产生的动载作用受路面工况和车速的影响也较大,由50 km/h、A级路面上的0.0833变化为120 km/h、D级路面上的0.7754,增大8.3倍。路面等级越低,车速越高,动载系数越大,对路面的破坏作用越严重。 相似文献
12.
为了研究水闸与市政道路联合布置时,闸上交通桥车辆动荷载对水闸结构安全和交通安全的影响,以上海市奉贤区南门港水闸为研究对象,建立三维有限元模型,采用线性时程分析法计算了车辆动荷载下交通桥的应力分布。经计算分析,车辆动荷载产生的应力主要由交通桥主梁承担,对水闸主体结构应力影响不大,闸路结合的方案总体是合理的;在不同的车辆参数(标准车辆和吊车,车速分别为60 km/h、80 km/h、100 km/h)和不同车流量下,交通桥主梁跨中应力峰值均不相同,因此为提高水闸运行的安全性,应对过闸车辆限速限载。 相似文献
13.
针对当前汽车零部件间动态间隙测量方法存在的问题,以SX3315DR326型自卸汽车为研究对象,对该车在空载和满载两种状态下,分别运行于三种路面和四种行驶工况(既:比利时路30km/h、平坦道路80km/h行驶、紧急制动和扭曲路)的主要零部件动态间隙进行测试分析,从而确定出汽车各运动部件在整车上的最大和最小间隙,为汽车设计整车布置提供准确依据。 相似文献
14.
15.
车辆在附着系数较小的圆曲线路段转向时,轮胎会处于非线性区内工作,此时基于线性理论的侧向稳定性分析方法会产生较大误差。建立6自由度非线性车辆系统模型,分析其处于非线性域与线性域下不同的特性状态,得到不同车速、路面附着系数下使车辆系统处于临界状态的圆曲线路段半径、超高设计指标。对线性域与非线性域内的车辆系统分别采用基于线性理论的根轨迹法与基于非线性理论的相平面法分析侧向稳定性,得到综合考虑2种状态下车辆临界失稳状态的圆曲线路段指标。结果表明,车速为60 km/h,路面附着系数为0.24,超高小于6% 时,车辆发生侧向失稳时轮胎处于非线性域,此时使用相平面法分析得到侧向失稳临界指标;车速为60 km/h,路面附着系数为大于0.4,超高处于4%到10%之间时,车辆发生侧向失稳时轮胎处于线性域,此时使用根轨迹法分析得到侧向失稳临界指标。 相似文献
16.
Stationar- und Ubergangsverhalten von Sattel- und Lasttugen bei der Kreisfahrt: Lineare Berechnungen
F. Vlk 《Vehicle System Dynamics: International Journal of Vehicle Mechanics and Mobility》1983,12(6):331-350
Steady and Transient Turning of Tractor-Semitrailer and Truck-Trailer Combinations: A Linear Analysis
A simplified analysis is made of the yaw stability and control of the two types of the commercial vehicle combinations (tractor-semitrailer, truck-trailer) at a constant forward velocity during steady and transient turning. The combined vehicle is treated as a linear dynamic system (Fig. 2). The steer angle at the front wheels of the tractor (or truck) and the steady-state responses if the road verhicle train (yaw rate, articulation angles and sideslip angle) are calculated (Equations 18 to 25). Exploratory calculations are performed to determine the influence of the cornering stiffness of the tires for the two types of the vehicle combinations upon the steady-state responses (Figs. 7 to 10). For a linear simplified model of articulated vehicle the steady-state turning behaviour is stable also under conditions of rather high driving speed (70 km/h). A simplified analysis of the transient turning behaviour of the two types of road trains has shown the tractor-semitrailer to preserve stability even under driving speeds exceeding 70 km/h (Fig. 13), whereas the truck-trailer combinations appear to become oscillatory unstable if the driving speed rises above the 60 km/h margin (Fig. 14). 相似文献
A simplified analysis is made of the yaw stability and control of the two types of the commercial vehicle combinations (tractor-semitrailer, truck-trailer) at a constant forward velocity during steady and transient turning. The combined vehicle is treated as a linear dynamic system (Fig. 2). The steer angle at the front wheels of the tractor (or truck) and the steady-state responses if the road verhicle train (yaw rate, articulation angles and sideslip angle) are calculated (Equations 18 to 25). Exploratory calculations are performed to determine the influence of the cornering stiffness of the tires for the two types of the vehicle combinations upon the steady-state responses (Figs. 7 to 10). For a linear simplified model of articulated vehicle the steady-state turning behaviour is stable also under conditions of rather high driving speed (70 km/h). A simplified analysis of the transient turning behaviour of the two types of road trains has shown the tractor-semitrailer to preserve stability even under driving speeds exceeding 70 km/h (Fig. 13), whereas the truck-trailer combinations appear to become oscillatory unstable if the driving speed rises above the 60 km/h margin (Fig. 14). 相似文献
17.
Stationar- und Ubergangsverhalten von Sattel- und Lasttugen bei der Kreisfahrt: Lineare Berechnungen
《Vehicle System Dynamics: International Journal of Vehicle Mechanics and Mobility》2012,50(6):331-350
ABSTRACT Steady and Transient Turning of Tractor-Semitrailer and Truck-Trailer Combinations: A Linear Analysis A simplified analysis is made of the yaw stability and control of the two types of the commercial vehicle combinations (tractor-semitrailer, truck-trailer) at a constant forward velocity during steady and transient turning. The combined vehicle is treated as a linear dynamic system (Fig. 2). The steer angle at the front wheels of the tractor (or truck) and the steady-state responses if the road verhicle train (yaw rate, articulation angles and sideslip angle) are calculated (Equations 18 to 25). Exploratory calculations are performed to determine the influence of the cornering stiffness of the tires for the two types of the vehicle combinations upon the steady-state responses (Figs. 7 to 10). For a linear simplified model of articulated vehicle the steady-state turning behaviour is stable also under conditions of rather high driving speed (70 km/h). A simplified analysis of the transient turning behaviour of the two types of road trains has shown the tractor-semitrailer to preserve stability even under driving speeds exceeding 70 km/h (Fig. 13), whereas the truck-trailer combinations appear to become oscillatory unstable if the driving speed rises above the 60 km/h margin (Fig. 14). 相似文献
18.
19.
针对某自卸汽车底盘在使用过程中出现的异常振动问题,进行了道路行驶试验研究。测量了典型部位的振动加速度信息,并进行了时域和频域分析,得到了自卸汽车底盘的振动特性,找出了导致该自卸汽车底盘产生异常振动的原因。当车速为60 km/h或65 km/h时,车轮不平衡质量引起的激励或路面不平引起的激励频率接近了该自卸汽车底盘车架的1阶、2阶固有频率,车架产生共振,使自卸汽车底盘发生异常的横向抖动。为消除或减少该自卸汽车底盘异常振动现象,应控制各车轮不平衡质量,或改进车架结构,使车架结构的固有频率远离车轮的激振频率。 相似文献