神背嘴滩整治方案与治理效果分析

在总结历史治理经验的基础上,通过模型试验研究了神背嘴滩的碍航特征及成滩原因。通过新开右槽、建整治建筑物等措施调整汊道分流比和束水攻沙,使航道尺度增大到2.7m×50m×560m,改善了枯水弯、浅、险的碍航问题,保证了航槽的稳定。整治方案可为山区河流急弯滩险治理提供借鉴。     

长江上游莲石滩复杂滩险的碍航特性及治理思路

莲石滩是长江上游著名的复杂滩险,具有浅、险、急等复合碍航特性,为山区河流典型的复杂滩险。依据详尽的地形及水文实测资料,分析莲石滩近几十年河床演变规律和洪中枯水流特性,针对滩险的碍航特性和成滩原因提出了整治思路。研究成果可为这种枯水期水浅、流急、坡陡的互逆型非基岩滩险的治理提供借鉴。     

岷江下游霸王滩滩险整治技术

岷江下游河段为天然航道,其具有典型的山区河流特征,碍航特性极其复杂,加之河道历年来受挖砂采石影响,航道条件严重恶化。针对该段航道中霸王滩弯、急、浅、险的碍航问题,采用平面二维水流数学模型,在碍航特性及滩险成因分析的基础上,从通航水流改善程度、挖槽稳定性以及船舶自航上滩等方面进行多组方案的比选和优化,确定较为合理的整治方案,同时提出山区河流类似滩险的整治原则、理念及对应措施。结果表明,修改方案1-1的总体整治效果较好,工程量较其他方案小,为推荐的整治方案。     

长江上游渣角滩航道整治试验研究

长江上游渣角河段为典型的分汊河道,具有"弯、浅、险、急"的碍航特性,整治难度较大。综合考虑其滩险成因、整治目标及主、支汊关系等因素后,提出3种不同的整治思路,并采用物理模型进行试验研究。结果表明:开辟新航槽,调整分流比,获取两汊平衡的整治效果较好,可根本解决碍航问题,能够实现两汊同时通航。     

岷江下段航道典型滩险整治技术

岷江干流龙溪口枢纽以下河段为天然航道,具有典型的山区河流特征,碍航特性极其复杂,加之河道历年来受挖沙采石影响,航道条件恶化严重。采用长河段平面二维水流数学模型对拟建岷江龙溪口枢纽至屏山镇岷江大桥段11处滩险的整治方案进行对比分析及优化研究。在碍航特性及滩险成因分析的基础上,选取该段航道内干龙子滩、白甲滩以及新开河滩段3个具有典型代表性的滩段,从通航水流改善程度、挖槽稳定性以及船舶自航上滩等方面进行多组方案的比选,总结岷江下段典型代表性滩险的整治技术。     

山区大型河流弯曲分汊河段航道整治思路与措施

铜鼓滩为弯曲分汊浅险滩,弯槽为枯水航槽,上口水浅,不满足尺度要求,中段航槽落湾,弯曲半径小,下口流速大,流态乱,上下水船舶航行危险。通过叙泸段工程整治,该滩碍航问题得到解决。基于模型试验成果和工程实际效果,通过研究该滩水沙特点和碍航特性,对治理思路与整治措施进行剖析。该类滩险主流洪水趋直,枯水落湾,洪水面流与底流分离,面流趋直,底流携带泥沙落弯;可开辟窄深型直汊通航,辅以江中整治建筑物束水维持航槽稳定;考虑到水沙分离的规律,应合理确定分流点,使水流归直槽,泥沙仍走弯槽。     

长江上游弯曲放宽河段卵石浅险滩航道整治

弯曲放宽河段卵石浅滩是长江上游枯期需重点维护的滩险,以往虽对该类型滩段进行了多次整治,但对其碍航机理的认识仍显不足。通过对以往整治经验和模型试验成果的总结和研究认为,在难以彻底改善弯曲汊道航行条件的情况下,可考虑选择直槽整治的方式,采取基建性疏浚和整治建筑物等综合性的枯水治理措施。针对不同型式挖槽断面的水流结构和典型滩险的直槽方案所做的模型试验表明,＂窄深型＂挖槽断面稳定性相对较好。为满足直槽挖槽的稳定,可采取调整汊道分流比、束窄直槽过水断面等整治措施。     

长江渝泸段滩险整治小尺度船模通航试验研究

长江上游泸渝河段，全长270km，为典型的山区河流，河段内滩险众多。在天然状态下，本河段共有碍航滩险52处，其中大多为枯水急流险滩。文中主要以泸渝河段斗笠子滩和城背嘴滩为例分析小尺度船模在滩险整治通航试验中的应用。     

广西郁江鸡儿滩航道整治工程简介

论述鸡儿滩碍航情况、航道整治方案与整治效果,为今后整治该类位于下一级枢纽末端和上一枢纽坝下的滩险整治提供了经验。整治工程被评为优良工程。     

澜沧江曼厅大沙坝水道河床演变及航道整治

以曼厅大沙坝浅滩航道整治为依托,针对滩险整治过程中提升航道等级并维护航槽稳定的问题,从水文特征、河床演变和历史航道整治状况等3个方面总结澜沧江曼厅大沙坝河段河势变化及航道现状,分析此滩险河段现有的滩槽格局及滩险成因,提出以守护为基础、采用中枯水两级整治思路的整治方案。结果表明,在兼具库区特征的滩险整治过程中,采用疏浚增加航槽水深,并布置整治建筑物守护洲滩、束水攻沙,能够提高航道尺度,保障航槽稳定。     

33rd International Conference on Ocean,Offshore and Arctic Engineering （OMAE2014）

正San Francisco,California,June 8-13,2014.OMAE 2014 is the ideal forum for researchers,engineers,managers,technicians and students from the scientific and industrial communities from around the world to:·meet and present advances in technology and its scientific support;·to exchange ideas and experiences whilst promoting technological progress and its application in industry·to promote international cooperation in ocean,offshore and arctic engineering.In line with the tradition of excellence of previous OMAE conferences,more than 900 technical papers are planned for presentation.Outreach for Engineers Specialty Forum This Specialty Forum is designed for students and professionals who may not be familiar with the Ocean and Offshore industry,as well as those who have just recently specialized in this field.     

Errata

正In the paper"Influence of Fouling Assemblage on the Corrosion Behaviour of Mild Steel in the Coastal Waters of The Gulf of Mannar,India"in Vol.12,No.4,Page:509,References were lost,and the two authors’biographies were identical.The correct text is shown below.We apologize to the authors and our readers for any inconvenience caused by the errors.     

Journal of Marine Science and Application 2014 Sum. Contents

正~~     

第34届海洋、离岸及极地工程国际会议(英文)

正St.John's,Newfoundland,Canada,May 31-June 5,2015 OMAE2015 is the ideal forum for researchers,engineers,managers,technicians and students from the scientific and industrial communities from around the world to: meet and present advances in technology and its scientific support;     

联合作战计划和执行系统

全球指挥控制系统(GCCS)实施当前美国海军网络中心战信息基础设施的联合计划网络。联合作战计划和执行系统(JOPES)支持GCCS实现联合计划。JOPES有两类计划：时间不限的精密预案计划生成作战计划、方案计划或职能计划；时间敏感的危机行动计划生成作战命令或战役方案。前者在和平时期创建的作战计划是后者的计划基础，加速应付危机的能力。     

Recent progress on wave induced loading measurements in warships

Recent measurements of wave induced hull strain and flexure in RN warships are presented together with the derivation of the current design criteria for extreme hull girder bending loads. The history of the development of the shipboard instrumentation used is given and recent developments to improve the quality and ease of analysis of the data are described. An unexpectedly high transverse asymmetry in the longitudinal strains measured in destroyers is shown to be the result of a combination of vertical and lateral bending in oblique seas. Finally recent theoretical comparisons between the loading of Deep-Vee hulls and conventional UK rounded bilge hulls are presented which demonstrate the higher loading experienced by this type of hull form.     

The 11th International Conference on Hydrodynamics (ICHD 2014)

正19–24 October 2014 SingaporeCONFERENCE THEMES The overall aim of the ICHD Conference is to provide a forum for participants from around the world to review,discuss and present the latest developments in the broad discipline of hydrodynamics and fluid mechanics.The first International Conference on Hydrodynamics(ICHD)was initiated in 1994 in Wuxi,China.Since then,9 more ICHD conferences were held subsequently in Hong Kong,Seoul,Yokohama,Tainan,Perth,Ischia,Nantes,Shanghai and St Petersburg.Evidently the ICHD conference has become an important event among academics,researchers,engineers and operators,working in the fields closely related to the science and technology of hydrodynamics.The 11th ICHD will be held in Singapore in 2014.     

第十二届深水操作会议和展览会(英文)

正November 4-6,2014Moody Gardens HotelConvention Center/Galveston,TX The Deepwater Operations Conference and Exhibition is celebrating its 12th anniversary this year.This growing event will continue the tradition of excellence in addressing operational challenges involved in developing deepwater resources.We will return to the Moody Gardens Hotel and Convention Center on November 5-7,2014 in Galveston,Texas.     

Eastbound or westbound ?

In terms of equal sailing distances, where is the inflexion when ships depart from ports in the Asian Continent to New York via Suez and/or Panama？
The answer is China South Port Group （Hong Kong, Shenzhen and Guangzhou）.     

Impact of regulation on the performances of long-distance transport services: A comparison of the different approaches in Sweden and Norway

Despite the many socio-economic similarities between Sweden and Norway, differences in jurisdiction, organisation, cooperation, and financing of long-distance passenger train and coach services have led to the development of four distinctively different ways of serving the markets. This paper describes how the train and coach markets have developed in the two countries, with emphasis on regulatory and industrial structure and a couple of performance variables.Looking at passenger rail, both countries separated infrastructure from operation over a decade ago. However, while Norwegian rail is characterised by an almost monopoly supplier, rail services in Sweden are partly decentralised to the responsibility of county authorities and are widely subjected to competitive tendering. The rest of the network is about to be opened up for on-the-track competition. Swedish Rail (SJ) has spent the last decades consolidating its core business (passenger rail) and sold out its other businesses. In contrast, the Norwegian state rail (NSB) has expanded its business to become a major bus operator and property owner, with extensions also into the Swedish market.The coach industry was more recently deregulated in both countries. The Swedish coach market is dominated by privately owned companies operating services to and from Stockholm. In Norway, state-owned NSB is a major coach operator on medium distance routes, and is also the largest partner of Nor-Way Bussekspress which totally dominates long-distance coach services. Further, the Norwegian coach market is characterised by cross-ownership and cooperation which has enabled an extensive route network which covers most of Norway.We find distinct differences in achievements in the two modes and in the two countries. Swedish rail services have succeeded in winning market shares and in renewing and developing both infrastructure and service levels to a greater extent than the Norwegian model. On the other hand, the Norwegian coach market seems to be more developed and efficient compared to its Swedish counterpart.The paper concludes with a discussion on the possible links between the different approaches and the performance observed, with the aim to stimulate further and more detailed research on some important issues.