首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

两种类型踏面的车辆与轨道耦合动力学性能比较
引用本文:王开云,翟婉明,蔡成标.两种类型踏面的车辆与轨道耦合动力学性能比较[J].西南交通大学学报,2002,37(3):260-264.
作者姓名:王开云  翟婉明  蔡成标
作者单位:西南交通大学牵引动力研究中心,四川,成都,610031
基金项目:高等学校骨干教师资助计划项目
摘    要:采用车辆-轨道耦合动力学理论及其相应的动力学仿真软件TTISIM,分别对锥形(TB型)和磨耗形(LM型)踏面车辆与轨道的动力学性能进行理论仿真计算,并对计算结果进行了详细的比较。结果表明:LM型跳面有利于车辆动态曲线通过;TB型踏面对提高车辆蛇行失稳临界速度有利;两种类型踏面车轮对车辆在直线轨道上的平稳性差别甚小。

关 键 词:动力学性能  车轮踏面  比较  车辆-轨道耦合动力学  锥形踏面  磨耗形踏面  轮轨关系
文章编号:0258-2724(2002)03-0260-05

Comparison between Vehicle-Track Coupling Dynamic Performances of Railway Vehicles with Two Types of Wheel Profiles
WANG Kai yun,ZHAI Wan ming,CAI Cheng biao.Comparison between Vehicle-Track Coupling Dynamic Performances of Railway Vehicles with Two Types of Wheel Profiles[J].Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University,2002,37(3):260-264.
Authors:WANG Kai yun  ZHAI Wan ming  CAI Cheng biao
Abstract:With the theory of vehicle track coupling dynamics and the simulation software TTISIM, dynamic performances of vehicles with the cone and the worn profiles, respectively, are calculated and compared in detail. The results show that the worn profile wheels perform better on curve tracks, while the cone profile wheels have higher critical speed of hunting stability. There is not obvious difference in carbody vibration of vehicles with the two type profiles running on tangent tracks.
Keywords:vehicles  dynamics  wheel profile  comparison  vehicle  track coupling dynamics
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号