首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Environmentally appraising different pavement and construction scenarios: A comparative analysis for a typical local road
Institution:1. DICAM – Dipartimento di Ingegneria Civile, Ambientale, Aerospaziale e dei Materiali, Scuola Politecnica, Università degli Studi di Palermo, Palermo, Italy;2. DEIM – Dipartimento di Energia, Ingegneria dell’Informazione e Modelli Matematici, Scuola Politecnica, Università degli Studi di Palermo, Palermo, Italy;1. Faculty of Applied Engineering Sciences, University of Antwerp, Rodestraat 4, 2000 Antwerp, Belgium;2. Faculty of Applied Economic Sciences, University of Antwerp, Prinsstraat 13, 2000 Antwerp, Belgium;1. OHL School of Construction, College of Engineering and Computing, Florida International University, 10555, EC 2900, West Flagler Street, Miami, FL 33174, United States;2. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, College of Engineering and Computing, Florida International University, 10555, EC 3601, West Flagler Street, Miami, FL 33174, United States;1. EESAC, 230 Impasse de Fergy, 74410 Duingt, France;2. DPST Consulting, 6 rue Adèle, 93250 Villemomble, France;3. Federation of German Lime Industry (BVK), Annastrasse 67-71, 50968 Cologne, Germany;4. Lhoist Southern Europe, Tour W, 102 Terrasse Boieldieu, 92085 Paris La Défense Cedex, France;5. Carmeuse Group, Rue du Château 13a, 5300 Seilles, Belgium;6. European Lime Association (EuLA), Rue de Deux Eglises 26/2, 1000 Brussels, Belgium;1. Department of Civil Engineering, Universidad Europea de Madrid, C/ Tajo s/n, 28670 Villaviciosa de Odón, Spain;2. Department of Ecology, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, C/ José Antonio Novais 12, 28040 Madrid, Spain
Abstract:The aim of this work is to carry out a comparative analysis of environmental impacts for different scenarios of a typical local road. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is the modeling tool used to quantify and characterize comparative environmental impacts. In carrying out this specific application of the LCA, different road construction techniques were considered with regards to the whole structure and compared in order to identify the best alternative in terms of environmental sustainability.So far, in fact, typical LCA frameworks of roads have focused on recycled materials for pavement layers only, thus neglecting study of the materials used in the embankment or in the subgrade. In this study, these materials were included too, in order to prove the environmental benefit of using a sustainable technique such as in situ stabilization of fine soils with lime (typically dumped clayey soils) in order to reduce the need for virgin material for embankment and subgrade construction.When using different percentages of recycled materials (such as reclaimed asphalt pavement – RAP) in the bituminous layer or in the foundation, the analysis of the functional unit studied shows a significant reduction of energy consumption and pollutant emissions mainly due to transportation of materials involved, in this way increasing the environmental performance of the road.Another important consideration is that the use of fine soils stabilized with lime “in situ”, instead of dumping it, not only is a good technical solution for improving soil mechanical properties, but it also produces a reduction of energy consumption and of pollutant emissions. It is noticeable that this technique results in a significant reduction of pollutant emissions due the transportation of involved materials, increasing the environmental performance of the road.
Keywords:Life Cycle Assessment  Road pavement  Recycled asphalt pavements  Soil stabilization
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号