价格听证中的信息不对称及其解决思路

行政听证是一个意见的交换、举证、质证和辩论的过程，是一个信息的交换和最大化过程，从而也是实现信息对称的过程。在价格听证中．信息具有不对称性，行政主体拥有法律信息，相对人拥有事实信息，但第三人却既不具有法律信息又不具有事实信息，从而价格决策难以达到公平和公正。要解决这一问题，应当把行政公开化扩大到垄断服务企业，建立成本效益评估制度，鼓励第三人委托律师或其他专业人员收集信息参与听证并由要求提价的企业承担由此所发生的费用。

Information Asymmetry in Price Hearing and its Solutions

Administrative hearing is a process of exchanging ideas, adducing evidence, cross-examination and debating. It is also a process of information exchanging and maximizing, which thereby realizes information symmetrization. Information is asymmetric in price hearing. Administrative bodies possess legal information and the opposite parties possess factual information, while the third parties have neither legal information nor factual information. Therefore, price decision would hardly be fair and square. To solve this problem, the scope of administrative openness should be broadened to involve enterprises providing monopoly services. In addition, we should build up cost-effectiveness evaluating system and encourage the third parties to authorize lawyers and other professionals collecting information so as to take part in the hearing, and expenses from these activities should be covered by those enterprises that ask to raise the price.