首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Willingness-to-pay for alternative fuel vehicle characteristics: A stated choice study for Germany
Institution:1. University of Wisconsin — Whitewater, Department of Economics, 800 W. Main Street, Whitewater, WI 53190, United States;2. USDA-NASS, Research and Development Division, 3251 Old Lee Highway, Fairfax, VA 22030, United States;3. The Ohio State University, Dept. of Ag., Env., and Dev. Economics, 2120 Fyffe Road, Columbus, OH 43210, United States;4. The Ohio State University, Dept. of Chem. and Biom. Engineering, 140 West Nineteenth Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210, United States;1. School of Resource and Environmental Management, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, BC V5A 1S6, Canada;2. The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA
Abstract:In the light of European energy efficiency and clean air regulations, as well as an ambitious electric mobility goal of the German government, we examine consumer preferences for alternative fuel vehicles (AFVs) based on a Germany-wide discrete choice experiment among 711 potential car buyers. We estimate consumers’ willingness-to-pay and compensating variation (CV) for improvements in vehicle attributes, also taking taste differences in the population into account by applying a latent class model with 6 distinct consumer segments. Our results indicate that about 1/3 of the consumers are oriented towards at least one AFV option, with almost half of them being AFV-affine, showing a high probability of choosing AFVs despite their current shortcomings. Our results suggest that German car buyers’ willingness-to-pay for improvements of the various vehicle attributes varies considerably across consumer groups and that the vehicle features have to meet some minimum requirements for considering AFVs. The CV values show that decision-makers in the administration and industry should focus on the most promising consumer group of ‘AFV aficionados’ and their needs. It also shows that some vehicle attribute improvements could increase the demand for AFVs cost-effectively, and that consumers would accept surcharges for some vehicle attributes at a level which could enable their private provision and economic operation (e.g. fast-charging infrastructure). Improvement of other attributes will need governmental subsidies to compensate for insufficient consumer valuation (e.g. battery capacity).
Keywords:Discrete choice  Stated preferences  Latent class model  Electric mobility  Compensating variation
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号