首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

不同加固方案在软土路基处治中的应用效果比较
引用本文:程贤志,张广明.不同加固方案在软土路基处治中的应用效果比较[J].公路,2007(7):113-115.
作者姓名:程贤志  张广明
作者单位:1. 江门市公路勘察设计院有限公司,江门市,529000
2. 江门市公路局,江门市,529000
摘    要:某段一级公路路基为软弱土层,地质条件差,路堤填方高,因此在大面积施工前,选取了代表性路段进行粉喷桩、砂桩和袋装砂井3种处治方案的比较。通过对各方案施工过程中地基孔隙水压力和路基沉降的观测结果分析,表明3种处治方案均具有可行性。结合经济性和地基固结情况分析,推荐采用袋装砂井处理方案。

关 键 词:加固  软土路基  观测  孔隙水压力  地表沉降
文章编号:0451-0712(2007)07-0113-03
修稿时间:2007-03-20

Application Effect Comparison of Different Reinforcement Plan on Soft Ground Treatment
CHENG Xian-zhi,ZHANG Guang-ming.Application Effect Comparison of Different Reinforcement Plan on Soft Ground Treatment[J].Highway,2007(7):113-115.
Authors:CHENG Xian-zhi  ZHANG Guang-ming
Institution:1. Jiangmen Highway Survey and Design Department Limited Company, Jiangmen 529000, China; 2. Bureau of Highway of Jiangmen City, Jiangmen 529000, China
Abstract:A representative part of an arterial highway foundation,which is soft soil,is chosen for reinforcement treating by three methods,such as cement-soil mixing pile,sand compaction pile and sand bag well.The monitoring results of the pore pressure and settlement show that although the three methods are all feasible,the sand bag well method is proposed as the treatment plan in view of the project cost and the consolidation degree.
Keywords:reinforcement  soft ground  monitoring  pore pressure  roadbed settlement
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号