首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

超大跨度斜拉桥几何非线性精细化分析
引用本文:梁鹏,肖汝诚,孙斌.超大跨度斜拉桥几何非线性精细化分析[J].中国公路学报,2007,20(2):57-62.
作者姓名:梁鹏  肖汝诚  孙斌
作者单位:1. 长安大学,桥梁与隧道陕西省重点实验室,陕西,西安,710064
2. 同济大学,桥梁工程系,上海,200092
摘    要:基于几何非线性分析的CR列式全量法,采用悬链线索单元模拟斜拉索,分析主跨为1 088 m的苏通大桥施工过程几何非线性影响。研究结果表明:该方法具有很高的精度和效率;经典的几何非线性分析方法引起的恒载应力相对误差在10%以内,主梁成桥标高相差超过0.5 m;对于张拉工况,经典方法增加荷载步数并不能提高其计算精度。建议超大跨度斜拉桥施工控制时采用精细化的分析方法。

关 键 词:桥梁工程  超大跨度斜拉桥  CR列式  几何非线性  悬链线索单元
文章编号:1001-7372(2007)02-0057-06
收稿时间:2006-08-13
修稿时间:2006年8月13日

Refined Geometrical Nonlinear Analysis for Super-long-span Cable-stayed Bridge
LIANG Peng,XIAO Ru-cheng,SUN Bin.Refined Geometrical Nonlinear Analysis for Super-long-span Cable-stayed Bridge[J].China Journal of Highway and Transport,2007,20(2):57-62.
Authors:LIANG Peng  XIAO Ru-cheng  SUN Bin
Abstract:Based on CR formulation superposition method for geometrical nonlinear analysis,the catenary cable element was used to simulate stay cable.Nonlinear influence for Sutong Bridge whose main span reaches 1 088 m during construction was studied.It is proved that accuracy and efficiency of the method are very high.Although the relative error of dead load stress caused by classic geometrical nonlinear analysis method is no more than 10%,it influences configuration of bridge significantly.The maximal error of elevation of main girder is more than 0.5 m when classic method is used.Using the classic method,increase of load steps can't make increase of calculation accuracy under the condition of tensile.So authors recommended to use refined analysis method in construction control.
Keywords:bridge engineering  super-long-span cable-stayed bridge  CR formulation  geometrical nonlinearity  catenary cable element
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号