首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

为审判监督权正名
引用本文:万毅.为审判监督权正名[J].上海交通大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2008,16(1):22-31.
作者姓名:万毅
作者单位:上海交通大学法学院,上海,200030
摘    要:人民检察院的刑事审判监督权遭受学界部分学者的质疑.但是,从检察制度生成的历史来看,检察官角色产生的主要目的之一便是监督、制约法官;从比较法的角度看,由检察官行使审判监督权,对法官的程序违法行为实施监督,也符合大陆法系国家检察官角色的基本定位;从现实的角度来看,检察官行使审判监督权包括庭审监督权并不会破坏审判的独立性、中立性以及控辩双方的平等性,因此,检察机关行使审判监督权具有法理合理性.

关 键 词:刑事审判监督  检察官  法官  庭审监督  审判监督权  正名  Supervision  Trial  Power  合理性  法理  检察机关  平等性  控辩双方  中立性  独立性  破坏  庭审  基本定位  国家  大陆法系  实施  违法行为  程序
文章编号:1008-7095(2008)01-0022-10
收稿时间:2007-09-26
修稿时间:2007年9月26日

Defending the Power of Trial Supervision
WAN Yi.Defending the Power of Trial Supervision[J].Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University(Social Science),2008,16(1):22-31.
Authors:WAN Yi
Abstract:The power of trial supervision of the People's Procuratorate has been widely criticized by Chinese scholars.However,historically,to supervise and restrict the power of judges is one of the main aims for instituting the prosecutors;from the perspective of comparative law,to supervise the judges' illegal procedural action by prosecutors accords with the basic orientation of the prosecutors' role in Continental countries;in reality,criminal trial supervision,including supervision of the trial process,does not undermine the independence,neutrality of the trial and the equality of the parties.Therefore,it is legitimate in legal principle for prosecutors to utilize the power of trial supervision.
Keywords:criminal trial supervision  prosecutor  judge  supervision of the trial process
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号