Valuing casualty risk reductions from estimated baseline risk |
| |
Authors: | Knut Veisten,Stefan Flü gel,Luis I. Rizzi,Juan de Dios Ortú zar,Rune Elvik |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Institute of Transport Economics (TOI), Gaustadalleen 21, NO-0349 Oslo, Norway;2. Department of Economics and Resource Management, Norwegian University of Life Sciences (UMB), P.O. Box 5003, NO-1432 Ås, Norway;3. Department of Transport Engineering and Logistics, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Casilla 306, Cod. 105, Correo 22, Santiago, Chile |
| |
Abstract: | ![]() Stated choice studies have been applied regularly to the valuation of time savings and other attributes of travelling as perceived by individuals. In such experiments, respondents often provide reference levels for the attributes and the hypothetical choices presented to them are pivoted around actual behaviour. However, most individuals are not able to provide reference levels for the number of casualties on the road they travel. Thus, if valuation of this important element is attempted, it is the researcher who must provide casualty risk reference levels to the respondents. Some studies have applied route choice experiments including a safety attribute but the majority has been limited to only one particular road section with a common baseline risk for all respondents. |
| |
Keywords: | C25 C83 C93 R41 |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|