| DX桩与直孔桩承载力对比分析 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 田文野.DX桩与直孔桩承载力对比分析[J].城市道桥与防洪,2012(5):101-104. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 田文野 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 北京市市政工程设计研究总院,北京市,100082 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 该文对实际工程中三岔挤扩灌注桩(简称DX桩)与直孔桩的抗压试验数据进行了分析。分析表明由于三岔挤扩灌注桩有承力盘或承力岔,其受力呈现为摩擦端承桩受力模式,相比直孔桩具有承载能力大,沉降小的良好受力性能。
|
| 关 键 词： | 三岔挤扩桩 DX桩 直孔桩 承力岔 承力盘 |
Comparison and Analysis of Carrying Capacities of DX Pile and Column Pile |
| |
| Tian Wenye.Comparison and Analysis of Carrying Capacities of DX Pile and Column Pile[J].Urban Roads Bridges & Flood Control,2012(5):101-104. |
| |
| Authors: | Tian Wenye |
| |
| Abstract: | The article analyzes the pressure resistant test data of three-fork squeezing bored pile and column pile. The analysis shows that the stress of three-fork squeezing bored pile presents the friction end bearing pile stress mode because of its bearing tray or bearing fork. It has the greater carrying capacity and the better stress performance of small settlement than the column pile. |
| |
| Keywords: | three-fork squeezing pile DX pile column pile bearing fork bearing tray |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
