首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


What type of road pricing scheme might appeal to politicians? Viewpoints on the challenge in gaining the citizen and public servant vote by staging reform
Institution:1. Institute of Transport and Logistics Studies, University of Sydney, Australia;2. Choice Modelling Centre, Institute for Transport Studies, University of Leeds, United Kingdom;3. Department of Transport and Planning, Delft University of Technology, the Netherlands;1. Institute of Transport Studies, Department of Civil Engineering, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia;2. Strome College of Business, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA 23529, USA;3. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117576, Singapore
Abstract:The greatest hurdle facing road pricing reform is political commitment. With rare exception, efforts to introduce significant reform in road pricing, aimed at raising sufficient revenue to ensure that road investment and ongoing maintenance is secured, without an additional impost to users above current outlays, while at the same time reducing traffic congestion, has fallen largely on politically non-supportive ears. The big challenge is to convince politicians (and their advisers) that it is possible to reform road pricing so that users are made better off (at least the great majority) in terms of time spent travelling and monies outlaid, and that government secures growing levels of revenue, but with at least some funds being used to improve public transport and the existing road network. This paper identifies the major issues that make much of the academic research into road pricing somewhat limited in terms of achieving real change. Staging reform is an appealing way forward, but ensuring the order and timing of events to secure progress is the big challenge. We offer some suggestions, including some ideas on new language designed to increase the level of buy in, and recognise that progress through action will require compromises in respect of an ‘ideal’ economically efficient pricing reform agenda.
Keywords:Road pricing reform  Revenue implications  Staging reform  Simple solutions  Use-related registration fees  Choice pricing
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号