| 以禅喻诗,莫此亲切--严羽"以禅喻诗"说论争的回顾与再探索 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 邓国军.以禅喻诗,莫此亲切--严羽"以禅喻诗"说论争的回顾与再探索[J].上海交通大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2002,10(2):108-112. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 邓国军 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 四川大学文学与新闻学院,四川,成都,610064 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 自严羽提出“以禅喻诗”说以来，论争纷起。最早反对严羽的是刘克庄，明确提出“诗之不可为禅，犹禅之不可为诗也。”之后，冯班、钱谦益等对严氏亦多诟病，至今余响不绝。赞成严氏的人亦不少，但对他时有误解。本文回顾了反对、赞成严氏的主要观点，并作辨析，另外对以禅喻诗的内在机制作了进一步控制。
|
| 关 键 词： | 严羽 论争 冯班 刘克庄 钱谦益 反对 辨析 观点 内在机制 |
| 文章编号： | 1008-7095(2002)02-0108-05 |
| 修稿时间： | 2001年12月21 |
It is the most Suitable to Analyse Poetics Metaphorically with Zen |
| |
| DENG Guo,jun.It is the most Suitable to Analyse Poetics Metaphorically with Zen[J].Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University(Social Science),2002,10(2):108-112. |
| |
| Authors: | DENG Guo jun |
| |
| Abstract: | Since Yan Yu said it was the most suitable to analyse poetics metaphorically with Zen, many arguments have arisen. The first man being against Yan Yu, was Liu Kezhuang who said poems couldn't make up Zen just as Zen couldn't make up poems. Then Feng Ban, Qian Qianyi and etc. were against Yan Yu, too. This hasn't ended nowadays. Meanwhile, many people supported Yan Yu, but they sometimes misunderstood him. This paper has reviewed the main viewpoints on being against and supporting him and given some analyses. This paper has probed more deeply into the internal mechanism of analysing poetics metaphorially with Zen. |
| |
| Keywords: | analyzing poetics metaphorically with Zen Wu internal mechanism inspiration |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
