首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

小样本条件下可变作用代表值的贝叶斯推断方法
引用本文:姚继涛,王旭东.小样本条件下可变作用代表值的贝叶斯推断方法[J].西南交通大学学报,2014,27(6):995-1001.
作者姓名:姚继涛  王旭东
基金项目:国家自然科学基金资助项目(50678143,51278401)
摘    要:为克服工程实际中测试数据不充足的条件下,采用经典统计学方法推断可变作用的代表值时,由统计不确定性导致推断结果偏于冒进的缺点,基于极小值I型分布分位值的线性回归推断方法,提出了小样本条件下可变作用代表值的线性回归推断方法,并以此作为检验其他推断方法精度的基准方法;根据贝叶斯理论,利用分布参数的Jeffreys无信息先验分布,提出可变作用标准值和频遇值的贝叶斯推断方法. 应用研究结果表明:贝叶斯推断方法较线性回归推断方法简便且应用范围广,在标准差已知的情况,可给出更优的推断结果;无参数信息时,对于标准值和频遇值的保证率不低于0.90的情况,贝叶斯推断方法均具有较好的精度;相对于其他可信水平,可信水平0.75时推断结果更接近真值,因此,建议取可信水平为0.75. 

关 键 词:荷载    代表值    贝叶斯方法    统计推断    小样本容量
收稿时间:2013-09-29

Bayesian Methods for Inferring Representative Values of Variable Actions in Small Sample Situations
YAO Jitao,WANG Xudong.Bayesian Methods for Inferring Representative Values of Variable Actions in Small Sample Situations[J].Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University,2014,27(6):995-1001.
Authors:YAO Jitao  WANG Xudong
Abstract:There is a need sometimes in engineering to infer the representative values of variable actions in cases when the test data is not sufficient, but the classical statistics methods do not take into account of the succedent influences of statistical uncertainty, and the inferred results are always on the aggressive side. In order to overcome the above shortcomings, applying the current linear regression estimation for inferring the fractiles of type I minimum distribution, the linear regression estimation of representative values of variable actions is proposed as a reference method for the precision inspection of other inference methods. According to Bayesian theory, applying Jeffreys non-informative prior distribution, a Bayesian method for inferring characteristic and frequent values of variable actions is put forward. The results show that the Bayesian inference method is more convenient than the liner regression estimation, and easy to use in a broader context. The method can give more advantageous results when standard deviation is known. If no parameter information is available, the Bayesian inference method has better precision when the guarantee rates of characteristic and frequent values are no less than 0.90. Compared with other confidence degrees, the inferred results are more close to the true value when the confidence degree equals 0.75; therefore, it is recommended to take a confidence degree of 0.75. 
Keywords:
点击此处可从《西南交通大学学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《西南交通大学学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号