| 盐通高速某软土路段两地基处理方案比选 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 郑晓国,薛晶.盐通高速某软土路段两地基处理方案比选[J].浙江交通职业技术学院学报,2012,13(4):1-3. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 郑晓国 薛晶 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1. 浙江交通职业技术学院,杭州,311112
2. 珠海城建市政建设有限公司,广东珠海,519000 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 根据盐通高速K13＋945～K14＋300软土路段的工程地质条件，对该路段采用湿喷桩和塑料排水板两种软基处理方案进行了施工可行、处理效果、经济造价三个方面的分析比较，最终推荐塑料排水板为优选地基处理方法。
|
| 关 键 词： | 软土地基 处理方案 比选 |
Comparison of Two Treatment Schemes for A Section of Soft Foundation of Yan-tong Expressway |
| |
| ZHENG Xiao-guo
,
XUE Jing.Comparison of Two Treatment Schemes for A Section of Soft Foundation of Yan-tong Expressway[J].Journal of Zhejiang Vocational and Technical Institute of Transportation,2012,13(4):1-3. |
| |
| Authors: | ZHENG Xiao-guo XUE Jing |
| |
| Institution: | 1.Zhejiang Institute of Communications,Hangzhou 311112,China;2.Zhuhai Urban Construction Municipal Construction Company Limited,Zhuhai 519000,China) |
| |
| Abstract: | According to the geographical condition of K13 ＋ 945 - K14 ＋ 300 soft foundation section of yantong expressway, Two treatment schemes of deep jet mixing pile and plastic drainage board were analyzed and compared from three aspects as construction feasibility, Treatment effect and economical cost, finally Plastic Drainage Board was commended as optimum approach to improve soft foundation. |
| |
| Keywords: | soft foundation treatment scheme comparison |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
