| 隧道下穿已建高速公路设计方案比选 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 侯豪斌.隧道下穿已建高速公路设计方案比选[J].山西交通科技,2014(6):67-70. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 侯豪斌 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 山西省交通科学研究院,山西太原030006 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 以某隧道下穿已建高速公路为例,从经济、技术、安全、工期、环保等角度对比分析了明挖法、暗挖法、盖挖法三者的利与弊。结果表明采用盖挖法在环保、工期、经济效益、安全等方面具有明显优势,可为同类工程优化设计提供参考。
|
| 关 键 词： | 隧道 盖挖法 方案比选 |
The Design Scheme Comparison of A Tunnel Underpass Built Highway |
| |
| HOU Hao-bin.The Design Scheme Comparison of A Tunnel Underpass Built Highway[J].Shanxi Science & Technology of Communications,2014(6):67-70. |
| |
| Authors: | HOU Hao-bin |
| |
| Institution: | HOU Hao-bin (Shanxi Transportation Research Institute, Taiyuan, Shanxi 030006, China) |
| |
| Abstract: | Taking a tunnel underpass built highway as an example, this paper compared and analyzed the advantages and disadvantages of open excavation method, subsurface excavation method and cover excavation method from the view of economy, technology, safety, construction period and environmental protection, etc. The results showed that the cover excavation method had obvious advantages in the environmental protection, construction period, economic benefit and safety. It also provided the reference for similar engineering optimization design. |
| |
| Keywords: | tunnel cover excavation method scheme comparison |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录！ |
|
