| 中美植筋锚固技术对比分析 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 刘树明,丁志全,Amziane Mohamed Najib.中美植筋锚固技术对比分析[J].水运工程,2014(2):155-159. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 刘树明 丁志全 Amziane Mohamed Najib |
| |
| 作者单位： | 中交第四航务工程勘察设计院有限公司，广东 广州 510230;中交第四航务工程勘察设计院有限公司，广东 广州 510230;Conseil, Ingenierie and Developpement, Rabat, B.P 1340 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 为了对比中美植筋锚固技术规范中的异同,并为今后国际结构加固工程设计提供参考经验,结合摩洛哥某电厂改造项目,从植筋锚固构造要求和承载力设计值两个方面进行对比分析,并介绍了按美标规范进行的植筋锚固施工。研究结果发现:中美规范对植筋锚固技术的构造要求大体相同;但与美标相比,按中标计算的抗拉和抗剪承载力设计值偏保守。
|
| 关 键 词： | 植筋锚固 构造要求 承载力设计值 |
Comparison of adhesive anchor technology between Chinese and American codes |
| |
| LIU Shu-ming,DING Zhi-quan and Mohamed Najib Amziane.Comparison of adhesive anchor technology between Chinese and American codes[J].Port & Waterway Engineering,2014(2):155-159. |
| |
| Authors: | LIU Shu-ming DING Zhi-quan and Mohamed Najib Amziane |
| |
| Institution: | CCCC-FHDI Engineering Co., Ltd., Guangzhou 510230, China;CCCC-FHDI Engineering Co., Ltd., Guangzhou 510230, China;Conseil, Ingenierie and Developpement, Rabat, B.P 1340, Morocco |
| |
| Abstract: | In order to compare the differences of the anchoring technology between Chinese and American
codes, and to provide the reference for the future international concrete structure reinforcement design, the
configuration requirements and bearing capacity between the two are compared and analyzed. Besides, the adhesive
anchoring construction is introduced as per American codes. It is found that the configuration requirements are
almost the same, but compared with the American standards, the tensile bearing capacity and shear bearing capacity
are more conservative in Chinese codes. |
| |
| Keywords: | adhesive anchor configuration requirements designed bearing capacity |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《水运工程》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《水运工程》下载免费的PDF全文 |
|
