集装箱码头价格管理初探

我国的水运价格制度,主要包括远洋运价、内贸水运运价、国内水上客运运价、外贸港口费收、内贸港口费收5种。港口及码头价格管理是水运价格管理系统的重要组成部分。集装箱码头价格又是港口价格的组成部分,它是指集装箱码头对航行国内外的集装箱专用船舶运输集装箱货物、靠泊装     

建设合肥集装箱码头发展内河多式联运

通过对合肥港腹地经济、集装箱运输现状、集装箱生成量、合肥-上海航线价格竞争力的分析，论述了合肥港开展集装箱运输的总体条件、集装箱码头建设的必要性和可行性,为合肥港开展集装箱内支线多式联运和集装箱码头的建设提供依据。     

2011年中国港口集装箱码头信息工作暨价格成本核算会议在贵阳召开

由中国港口协会集装箱分会主办的2011年中国港口集装箱码头信息工作暨价格成本核算会议于2011年4月21—22日在贵阳召开,来自71家会员单位的112名代表参加会议。会上,中国港口协会集装箱分会常务副理事长夏伟江宣布2011年中国港口集装箱码头评优办法、2011年"深圳港杯"论文竞赛、2010年中国港口集装箱码头标准制作证书等事项;中国港口协会集装箱分会秘书长陈长庚作2010年工作报告;     

宁波舟山港集装箱码头顾客矩阵模型

简要介绍顾客矩阵的简单模型和基于顾客矩阵的市场竞争情况,并举例说明该模型在宁波舟山港各集装箱码头竞争中的应用,指出削低可察觉价格和提高可察觉使用价值是增强集装箱码头竞争力的主要手段。     

集装箱码头智能化发展建议

为了加快集装箱码头智能化发展,促进我国智能集装箱码头建设,介绍智能集装箱码头的布置、特点以及与传统集装箱码头、自动化集装箱码头的区别,重点分析国内外集装箱码头发展现状和集装箱码头智能化发展所需的关键技术,并针对集装箱码头智能化发展水平不足的现状,梳理目前智能集装箱码头发展所面临的挑战,进而提出我国集装箱码头智能化发展的相关建议。     

中港协集装箱分会会员单位集装箱吞吐量统计

单位名称锦州新时代集装箱码头股份有限公司大连集装箱码头有限公司一-一一一,-~--一一---一,一-.一一一一一一~一大连大港中海集装箱码头有限公司营口港务集团集装箱码头公司秦皇岛利港集装箱码头有限公司天津东方海陆集装箱码头有限公司天津港集装箱码头有限公司天津港第一港     

集装箱码头操作系统建设

随着集装箱业务的发展,越来越多的投资者青睐集装箱码头,导致我国集装箱码头企业竞争进一步加剧。集装箱码头企业开始着手引进先进的集装箱码头操作系统以提高码头作业效率和服务质量,加强其竞争优势。如何选择既适合集装箱码头企业当前实际情况又能适应企业未来业务发展需要的码头操作系统至关重要。笔者通过多年来对不同集装箱码头企业的了解及实施集装箱码头操作系统的经验提出自己的看法。     

中国主要港口集装箱码头吞吐量快报(2007年11月)

14序1234567891011121315单位名称16171811月1—11月增幅/月1—11月增幅/月1—11月增幅/202122232425262728293031323334353637锦州新时代集装箱码头股份有限公司大连集装箱码头有限公司大连港湾集装箱码头有限公司营口集装箱码头有限公司丹东港集团集装箱公司秦皇岛利港集装箱码头有限公司天津东方海陆集装箱码头有限公司天津五洲国际集装箱码头有限公司天津港集装箱码头有限公司天津港第一港埠公司天津港务局第二港埠有限公司龙口港集装箱公司烟台环球码头有限公司烟台东龙国际集装箱码头有限公司烟台港集装箱公司日照日青集装箱…     

美西港口旺季治“堵”新攻略

首先，各个港口码头存小同程度上削减集装箱码头免费存放时间。为了提高集装箱码头效率，促使货主和当事人尽快从集装箱码头提取集装箱，加快码头集装箱流通效率和减少码头拥堵，不少美国港口双管齐下，一方面缩短集装箱码头免费保管时间，另一方面提高超过免费时间提取的集装箱码头滞延费率。     

2006～2007年度中国港口前十强集装箱码头

一、中国港口前十强集装箱码头1、盐田国际集装箱码头有限公司;2、青岛前湾集装箱码头有限公司;3、赤湾集装箱码头有限公司;4、上港集团振东集装箱码头分公司;5、上海集装箱码头有限公司;6、上海沪东集装箱码头有限公司;7、上海盛东集装箱码头有限公司8、宁波港北仑第二集装箱有限公司;     

核动力集装箱船经济性分析

以大型集装箱船为研究目标,通过对普通燃油集装箱船与核动力集装箱船的运行费用进行分析,并对2种船舶全寿期内的运行费用进行比较。结果表明,在全寿期内,核动力集装箱船相比普通燃油集装箱船在油价高于367美元/t时,具有较好的经济性。     

上海港外贸集装箱装卸价格策略研究

面对市场激励的竞争,提出上海外贸集装箱装卸价格策略应定位在以竞争为主的价格策略,叙述了几种不同的价格调整策略,最后介绍了要实施所制定价格调整策略,所必需的保障措施。     

集装箱船舶大型化现状与未来发展预测

美国次贷危机对全球实体经济影响的加深以及国际石油价格的剧烈变化短期内可能改变集装箱船舶大型化的趋势,但是从长期看,全球集装箱船舶大型化的趋势仍将继续。本文利用相关数据,分析预测未来集装箱船舶大型化的发展状况。     

2010年世界船舶市场评述与展望

回顾了2010年世界船舶市场的发展,并对未来船舶市场进行了预测。随着世界经济的复苏,2010年航运市场出现反弹,虽然全年呈现震荡格局,但整体好于2009年,散货船、油船、集装箱船年平均运价均高于上年,特别是集装箱船年平均运价比上年高出一倍多。与此同时,三大船型建造市场出现轮动效应,上半年散货船引导造船市场,下半年行情有所下滑,油船订单则从第二季度开始增加,而沉寂许久的集装箱船建造市场在下半年也开始出现大量新订单。预计2011年的船舶市场将难以维持2010年的繁荣局面,但集装箱船建造市场和海工装备有望延续2010年下半年出现的良好市场行情。     

Demand analysis in Angola seaports

ABSTRACT

This paper presents a demand analysis of Angola seaports from 1996 to 2013 using the Berry, Levinsohn, and Pakes (BLP) demand model. The BLP is a random coefficient Logit demand model that takes into account the endogeneity of the price in the demand equation. The model reveals that seaports on Angola is explained by the average price, the price of maritime transport services, the price of substitute imports by airports, and by the income in the port region. The price is endogenous in demand equation and the endogeneity is taken into account in demand estimation. The price of air transportation is negative, and therefore it is a complementary good. The price of container handling is positive, and therefore it is a substitution good. Policy implication is also derived.     

Pricing policy and operational controls in container terminals

Following a general discussion on port pricing policies and structures the author explores the argument that price in itself provides an inadequate focus of needs and preferences of port users, especially users of container terminals, and suggests a system of input pricing related to the sale of terminal capability on a time basis.     

Linking ocean container carrier capabilities to shipper–carrier relationships: a case study

ABSTRACT

As outsourcing and offshoring continue to expand, the ocean container industry serves a critical and still increasing role in supporting global trade. Yet, perceived commoditization and intense price competition among ocean container carriers limit opportunities for competitive advantage and formation of long-term shipper–carrier relationships. This environment ultimately yields an unhealthy industry that threatens the stability of global supply chains. Extant literature provides limited insight into how carriers can build strong relationships with shippers to overcome the short-term, transactional-orientation of the industry. Examining a case study of a major ocean container carrier, we apply structural equation modeling to shipper survey data to explore how carrier operational, service, and pricing capabilities influence the strength of the long-term shipper–carrier relationship. Furthermore, we identify unique clusters of shipper needs, helping the carrier understand when and how to promote a particular portfolio of capabilities to customers.     

Economies of container ship size: a new evaluation

Based on recent operation performance data, the earnings and costs of container service have been investigated in the context of two inches developed by the japanese and used elsewhere in East Asian shipping: charater base. Although the average size of container ships on the world's main trade routes has increased over the past two decades it is dangerous to generalize about the ecnomies of scale derived from larger ship size. The effects of ship's on voyage results vary in accordance with such factors as ship's purchase price, level of running costs, level of freight rates, voyage length, achieved load factors and accounting methods used for allocating fixed costs. The question of optimum vessel, therfore, has no generally applicable answer. Shipowners must compromise.     

Economies of container ship size: a new evaluation

Based on recent operation performance data, the earnings and costs of container service have been investigated in the context of two inches developed by the japanese and used elsewhere in East Asian shipping: charater base. Although the average size of container ships on the world's main trade routes has increased over the past two decades it is dangerous to generalize about the ecnomies of scale derived from larger ship size. The effects of ship's on voyage results vary in accordance with such factors as ship's purchase price, level of running costs, level of freight rates, voyage length, achieved load factors and accounting methods used for allocating fixed costs. The question of optimum vessel, therfore, has no generally applicable answer. Shipowners must compromise.