共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 78 毫秒
1.
计入船体变形激励的大型船舶推进轴系振动性能研究 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
大型船舶的船体变形与其推进系统之间的耦合影响成为船舶领域的研究热点,开展船体变形激励下的推进轴系振动性能的研究对保证船舶可靠运行十分必要。文章以船舶轴系动力学方程为研究基础,建立其计入船体变形激励的大型船舶推进轴系的动力学模型并通过解析解与数值解的对比验证了方法的可靠性。依据此模型,以某大型集装箱船舶为研究对象,分别探索了船体变形激励不确定方向下以及变尺寸参数下轴系振动的影响规律,为大型船舶船体变形激励下的轴系振动问题提供了理论基础。 相似文献
2.
基于OpenFOAM的船舶与液舱流体晃荡在波浪中时域耦合运动的数值模拟 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
波浪中载液船舶运动激励舱内液体的晃荡,舱内液体晃荡产生的冲击力同时作用在舱壁上,进而影响船舶的运动姿态。波浪中船体水动力和时延函数是在势流理论范畴下采用切片法和脉冲响应函数方法计算获得的,液舱内液体非线性晃荡是基于粘性流理论实时计算模拟,两者耦合建立了波浪中载液船舶与液舱流体晃荡耦合的运动方程。论文基于开源CFD开发平台OpenFOAM,自主开发实现了船体运动与液舱晃荡的耦合计算程序,并进行了相应的数值模拟计算和验证工作。该方法完整地考虑了波浪、船体和液舱晃荡之间的耦合作用,并结合船体内外流场特点分别采用了势流和粘性流理论,具有较高的计算效率。通过数值模拟计算和模型实验研究表明,数值模拟计算能够清晰显现出液舱晃荡对船体全局运动影响,船体运动计算结果与模型实验结果吻合良好。 相似文献
3.
4.
5.
波浪中破损船舶的运动会同时受到波浪激励和进出水的影响,而船体运动也会影响进出水过程,二者相互影响。因此,准确地评估波浪中考虑破舱进出水影响的破损船体运动是十分复杂的。论文提出采用一种基于势流理论的方法进行波浪中破损船体运动的预报,该方法假设舱内的液面水平,利用修正的伯努利方程模拟破舱进/出水,利用Ikeda`s经验公式修正阻尼系数,采用4DOF(横荡-垂荡-横摇-纵摇)相互耦合的时域方法评估波浪中破损船体的运动。文中以一艘ITTC破损稳性标模为例,研究了规则波中破损船体的运动响应;通过计算结果和模型试验的对比,验证了论文采用方法的有效性,并研究了破舱口位置对运动响应的影响。研究表明,论文采用的数值模拟方法结合合理的横摇阻尼模型,可以定量地评估破损船舶在波浪中的运动。 相似文献
6.
7.
8.
环境载荷对自升式钻井平台动力响应的影响 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
为了研究海流载荷、波浪载荷、风载和浮力等环境载荷对自升式钻井平台力学响应的影响,进行了某平台在自存工况和作业工况下的数值分析。分别采用等效梁单元、梁单元、线性弹簧单元和线弹性基础模型来模拟船体、桩腿、船体-桩腿和桩靴-土壤。应用Stokes fifth-order波浪理论模拟水质点的运动规律,得到平台的响应特性。考察了各种环境载荷对平台数值计算结果的影响。结果表明:在自升式平台建模过程中,须要考虑浮力的作用,还应特别关注风载的影响,其次是海流载荷,最后是波浪载荷。 相似文献
9.
起重船舶在外海作业时受长周期涌浪的影响,吊物会发生大幅度晃动,严重时会影响施工效率和海上施工安全,为解决该问题,需对起重船-吊物系统在波浪中作业时的耦合运动响应规律进行研究.文章建立起重船-吊物系统的计算模型,通过频域计算分析得到起重船运动响应幅频算子;对起重船-吊物耦合系统进行时域模拟,研究波浪周期和吊绳绳长对吊物及船体运动响应的影响.计算结果表明,吊物是否发生大幅度共振与船体总体参数、波浪周期和吊绳长度有关;吊绳越长,吊绳承受的张力越大;波浪周期对吊绳张力的影响较小;吊物晃动对船体运动响应幅值的影响较小. 相似文献
10.
针对环境波高和船体垂荡运动对月池内流体运动的影响,本文采用CFD与模型试验相结合的方法,以某含月池的深拖母船为研究对象,数值模拟在不同幅值规则波激励下月池内流体自由液面爬升,结果显示,波浪幅值线性增加时,月池内流体液面增加呈非线性。分析船体在波浪中的垂荡运动和船体静水中做不同频率的垂荡简谐运动时月池内流体运动,结果显示船体垂荡运动存在明显双峰特性,且在船体垂荡运动频率为月池内流体共振频率时,月池内流体液面爬升最明显。 相似文献
11.
《船舶与海洋工程学报》2014,(2)
正In the paper"Influence of Fouling Assemblage on the Corrosion Behaviour of Mild Steel in the Coastal Waters of The Gulf of Mannar,India"in Vol.12,No.4,Page:509,References were lost,and the two authors’biographies were identical.The correct text is shown below.We apologize to the authors and our readers for any inconvenience caused by the errors. 相似文献
13.
《船舶与海洋工程学报》2014,(4)
正St.John's,Newfoundland,Canada,May 31-June 5,2015 OMAE2015 is the ideal forum for researchers,engineers,managers,technicians and students from the scientific and industrial communities from around the world to: meet and present advances in technology and its scientific support; 相似文献
14.
联合作战计划和执行系统 总被引:2,自引:1,他引:1
全球指挥控制系统(GCCS)实施当前美国海军网络中心战信息基础设施的联合计划网络。联合作战计划和执行系统(JOPES)支持GCCS实现联合计划。JOPES有两类计划:时间不限的精密预案计划生成作战计划、方案计划或职能计划;时间敏感的危机行动计划生成作战命令或战役方案。前者在和平时期创建的作战计划是后者的计划基础,加速应付危机的能力。 相似文献
15.
In terms of equal sailing distances, where is the inflexion when ships depart from ports in the Asian Continent to New York via Suez and/or Panama?
The answer is China South Port Group (Hong Kong, Shenzhen and Guangzhou). 相似文献
The answer is China South Port Group (Hong Kong, Shenzhen and Guangzhou). 相似文献
16.
Recent measurements of wave induced hull strain and flexure in RN warships are presented together with the derivation of the current design criteria for extreme hull girder bending loads. The history of the development of the shipboard instrumentation used is given and recent developments to improve the quality and ease of analysis of the data are described. An unexpectedly high transverse asymmetry in the longitudinal strains measured in destroyers is shown to be the result of a combination of vertical and lateral bending in oblique seas. Finally recent theoretical comparisons between the loading of Deep-Vee hulls and conventional UK rounded bilge hulls are presented which demonstrate the higher loading experienced by this type of hull form. 相似文献
17.
桥梁防撞设施物理模型试验 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
物理模型试验是预报防撞设施所受撞击力及优化设计方案的主要方法之一。结合杭州湾大桥柔性防撞设施及东海大桥独立式防撞体设计方案,阐述了船—防撞体撞击试验的基本原理、方法、试验方案及相关试验结果。提出了柔性防撞系统的优化方案。试验结果表明,该方案经济有效,可供预报类似桥梁防撞设施撞击力时参考。 相似文献
18.
印尼某电厂项目码头水工建筑物包括码头、防波堤和护岸等主要组成部分。在该项目水工建筑物的设计过程中,综合考虑当地的自然条件、施工能力和材料来源等因素,不断优化结构选型和结构断面。根据不同使用要求,护岸分别采用直立式和斜坡式2种结构型式,推荐的设计方案节省投资、施工方便,可供同类工程设计参考。 相似文献
19.
Gunnar Alexandersson Staffan Hultén Frode Longva 《Research in Transportation Economics》2010,29(1):212-218
Despite the many socio-economic similarities between Sweden and Norway, differences in jurisdiction, organisation, cooperation, and financing of long-distance passenger train and coach services have led to the development of four distinctively different ways of serving the markets. This paper describes how the train and coach markets have developed in the two countries, with emphasis on regulatory and industrial structure and a couple of performance variables.Looking at passenger rail, both countries separated infrastructure from operation over a decade ago. However, while Norwegian rail is characterised by an almost monopoly supplier, rail services in Sweden are partly decentralised to the responsibility of county authorities and are widely subjected to competitive tendering. The rest of the network is about to be opened up for on-the-track competition. Swedish Rail (SJ) has spent the last decades consolidating its core business (passenger rail) and sold out its other businesses. In contrast, the Norwegian state rail (NSB) has expanded its business to become a major bus operator and property owner, with extensions also into the Swedish market.The coach industry was more recently deregulated in both countries. The Swedish coach market is dominated by privately owned companies operating services to and from Stockholm. In Norway, state-owned NSB is a major coach operator on medium distance routes, and is also the largest partner of Nor-Way Bussekspress which totally dominates long-distance coach services. Further, the Norwegian coach market is characterised by cross-ownership and cooperation which has enabled an extensive route network which covers most of Norway.We find distinct differences in achievements in the two modes and in the two countries. Swedish rail services have succeeded in winning market shares and in renewing and developing both infrastructure and service levels to a greater extent than the Norwegian model. On the other hand, the Norwegian coach market seems to be more developed and efficient compared to its Swedish counterpart.The paper concludes with a discussion on the possible links between the different approaches and the performance observed, with the aim to stimulate further and more detailed research on some important issues. 相似文献