共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 812 毫秒
1.
2.
3.
4.
舰船维修系统是一个复杂系统,传统的建模方法难以表现其行为过程,并正确评估其战时保障能力。文章简要介绍了Agent技术在复杂系统建模中的优势及在军事系统中成功运用的范例,指出它是解决舰船维修系统建模与仿真的有效途径。根据舰船维修系统的组成及运作机制,简化特装厂的行为过程,围绕海军船厂和舰船技术状态演化的行为过程,提出了系统基于Agent技术建模与仿真的思想和方法,并以舰船为智能化的主体,构造了舰船Agent的特征模型及活动机制,给出了模型及维修环境的形式化程序片段,克服了形式化模型难以准确构造系统并评估其维修能力的缺陷。对系统的复杂性做了进一步的阐述,为今后的研究指明了方向。 相似文献
5.
6.
7.
8.
基于超网络的装备保障信息化模型构建及分析 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
装备保障信息化是由信息、技术、物资、装备和人员等诸多要素所构成,为清晰呈现装备保障信息化构成要素之间的关系,将装备保障信息化作为一个复杂系统,利用超网络相关理论进行分析,构建了装备研制子网络、装备使用子网络和装备维修子网络,描述各阶段人、技术、装备之间的相互关系;在此基础上形成装备保障信息化网络,覆盖装备研制-使用-维护-报废全寿命周期的过程,形象描述人、武器装备和人与武器装备结合的构成关系,对装备保障信息化的系统动力学研究提供了基于超网络的研究思路. 相似文献
9.
10.
由于复杂装备系统本身的复杂性导致了复杂装备系统维修过程的复杂性.在分析了复杂装备系统维修任务的概念,研究了维修任务之间的相互关系后,采用IDEF3建立复杂装备系统维修任务模型,基于图化简技术的模型化简规则.以案例验证了模型的正确性和有效性. 相似文献
11.
《船舶与海洋工程学报》2014,(2)
正In the paper"Influence of Fouling Assemblage on the Corrosion Behaviour of Mild Steel in the Coastal Waters of The Gulf of Mannar,India"in Vol.12,No.4,Page:509,References were lost,and the two authors’biographies were identical.The correct text is shown below.We apologize to the authors and our readers for any inconvenience caused by the errors. 相似文献
13.
《船舶与海洋工程学报》2014,(4)
正St.John's,Newfoundland,Canada,May 31-June 5,2015 OMAE2015 is the ideal forum for researchers,engineers,managers,technicians and students from the scientific and industrial communities from around the world to: meet and present advances in technology and its scientific support; 相似文献
14.
联合作战计划和执行系统 总被引:2,自引:1,他引:1
全球指挥控制系统(GCCS)实施当前美国海军网络中心战信息基础设施的联合计划网络。联合作战计划和执行系统(JOPES)支持GCCS实现联合计划。JOPES有两类计划:时间不限的精密预案计划生成作战计划、方案计划或职能计划;时间敏感的危机行动计划生成作战命令或战役方案。前者在和平时期创建的作战计划是后者的计划基础,加速应付危机的能力。 相似文献
15.
In terms of equal sailing distances, where is the inflexion when ships depart from ports in the Asian Continent to New York via Suez and/or Panama?
The answer is China South Port Group (Hong Kong, Shenzhen and Guangzhou). 相似文献
The answer is China South Port Group (Hong Kong, Shenzhen and Guangzhou). 相似文献
16.
Recent measurements of wave induced hull strain and flexure in RN warships are presented together with the derivation of the current design criteria for extreme hull girder bending loads. The history of the development of the shipboard instrumentation used is given and recent developments to improve the quality and ease of analysis of the data are described. An unexpectedly high transverse asymmetry in the longitudinal strains measured in destroyers is shown to be the result of a combination of vertical and lateral bending in oblique seas. Finally recent theoretical comparisons between the loading of Deep-Vee hulls and conventional UK rounded bilge hulls are presented which demonstrate the higher loading experienced by this type of hull form. 相似文献
17.
桥梁防撞设施物理模型试验 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
物理模型试验是预报防撞设施所受撞击力及优化设计方案的主要方法之一。结合杭州湾大桥柔性防撞设施及东海大桥独立式防撞体设计方案,阐述了船—防撞体撞击试验的基本原理、方法、试验方案及相关试验结果。提出了柔性防撞系统的优化方案。试验结果表明,该方案经济有效,可供预报类似桥梁防撞设施撞击力时参考。 相似文献
18.
印尼某电厂项目码头水工建筑物包括码头、防波堤和护岸等主要组成部分。在该项目水工建筑物的设计过程中,综合考虑当地的自然条件、施工能力和材料来源等因素,不断优化结构选型和结构断面。根据不同使用要求,护岸分别采用直立式和斜坡式2种结构型式,推荐的设计方案节省投资、施工方便,可供同类工程设计参考。 相似文献
19.
Gunnar Alexandersson Staffan Hultén Frode Longva 《Research in Transportation Economics》2010,29(1):212-218
Despite the many socio-economic similarities between Sweden and Norway, differences in jurisdiction, organisation, cooperation, and financing of long-distance passenger train and coach services have led to the development of four distinctively different ways of serving the markets. This paper describes how the train and coach markets have developed in the two countries, with emphasis on regulatory and industrial structure and a couple of performance variables.Looking at passenger rail, both countries separated infrastructure from operation over a decade ago. However, while Norwegian rail is characterised by an almost monopoly supplier, rail services in Sweden are partly decentralised to the responsibility of county authorities and are widely subjected to competitive tendering. The rest of the network is about to be opened up for on-the-track competition. Swedish Rail (SJ) has spent the last decades consolidating its core business (passenger rail) and sold out its other businesses. In contrast, the Norwegian state rail (NSB) has expanded its business to become a major bus operator and property owner, with extensions also into the Swedish market.The coach industry was more recently deregulated in both countries. The Swedish coach market is dominated by privately owned companies operating services to and from Stockholm. In Norway, state-owned NSB is a major coach operator on medium distance routes, and is also the largest partner of Nor-Way Bussekspress which totally dominates long-distance coach services. Further, the Norwegian coach market is characterised by cross-ownership and cooperation which has enabled an extensive route network which covers most of Norway.We find distinct differences in achievements in the two modes and in the two countries. Swedish rail services have succeeded in winning market shares and in renewing and developing both infrastructure and service levels to a greater extent than the Norwegian model. On the other hand, the Norwegian coach market seems to be more developed and efficient compared to its Swedish counterpart.The paper concludes with a discussion on the possible links between the different approaches and the performance observed, with the aim to stimulate further and more detailed research on some important issues. 相似文献