轨道不平顺激励下铝合金地铁车体振动分析

轻量化地铁车辆多为以型材铆焊成型的铝合金车体结构,必须具有良好的振动特性,以保证旅客的乘坐舒适性。轨道随机不平顺是引起车辆强迫振动的主要原因,有必要分析轨道不平顺激励下铝合金地铁车辆车体的振动响应,为车体优化设计提供理论参考。详细分析了铝合金A型地铁车辆车体结构特点,经过合理简化几何模型,建立了符合车体结构力学特性的白车身有限元模型。以德国高干扰线路作为激励源,运用多体系统动力学分析软件ADMAS/Rail建立了铝合金地铁动车系统动力学分析模型并计算获得车体在转向架支撑处的动载荷。将所求动载荷施加于车体相应位置,在ANSYS软件中进行车体谐响应分析,计算了车体在轨道不平顺激励下的振动响应。结果显示,车体振动最大峰值频率与车体一阶扭转和一阶弯曲模态频率基本一致。     

Q355GNHD高耐候钢在动车组中的焊接运用

详细介绍了出口突尼斯动车组车体钢结构的特点,通过各部位焊接工艺试验,结合车体钢结构组装焊接工艺,选取了与之匹配的焊接材料Q355GNHD高耐候钢,确定了合适的焊接工艺参数,并制定出该车的生产工艺方案,满足了产品设计的制造需要。     

关于提高货车制动系统关键部件可靠性方法的探讨

通过对我国现有铁路货车制动系统进行分析,并与国外先进制动系统对比,得出我国货车制动系统存在检修周期短、关键零部件可靠性不高的问题。同时,根据目前存在的问题,简要论述提高我国货车制动系统可靠性的方法。     

W203型地铁牵引轨道车车体强度分析

文章介绍了W203型地铁牵引轨道车的车体结构形式、车体强度载荷工况、有限元静强度分析计算结果和疲劳强度计算结果、车体静强度试验验证,结果表明车体强度满足设计及标准要求。     

波罗轿车的被动安全性设计综述

被动安全性是轿车开发中的一项重要内容，对于小型轿车由于其车身尺寸较小，显得更加重要。波罗轿车的被动安全性设计是建立在大众公司多年公司多年来对全世界各种碰撞安全法规和交通事故的研究基础之上，涵盖了正面、偏置、侧面、后部、翻滚以及车对车碰撞等各个方面，为小型轿车的被动安全性树立了典范。     

微型电动轿车车身骨架结构分析

利用ANSYS软件对某进口微型电动轿车车身骨架进行了强度、刚度和模态计算：分析了电动轿车车身骨架的结构特点和电瓶盒等钣金件的影响，提出了独立悬架边界条件的模拟方法。     

凌志LS430轿车电动倾斜和伸缩转向柱的故障诊断与维修

介绍了2001款凌志LS430型轿车电动倾斜与伸缩转向柱的组成和功能。该转向柱系统具有故障自诊断功能。介绍了故障码B2602钥匙开锁警告开关电路故障、故障码B2610倾斜位置传感器或电动机电路故障等的诊断。另外，介绍了执行器电源电路和ECU电源电路、倾斜电动机和伸缩电动机电路等的俭修     

汽车防追尾碰撞数学模型研究

为了提高车辆在高速行驶状态下的主动安全性能,研究了处于追尾行驶状态的本车与前车的运动学特征;针对前车的不同运动状态分别推导出了跟车距离的计算模型并分析了模型中3个关键参数的随机性和动态性,对制动迟滞时间提出了基于模糊推理的确定方法,对本车制动减速度和前车的运动加速度提出了比较实用的动态测算公式;另外,研究了防追尾碰撞的控制与执行,建立了动态调整安全制动停车距离的神经网络模型,提出了基于危险裕度判别的安全控制方法。     

车辆折算系数的分类及算法

提出了标准车的选择原则:车长等于约定的长度;当交通流密度很小时,以道路设计速度行驶;驾驶员遵守交通规则。定义了微观车辆折算系数:交通流全部由标准车组成时的流量与交通流全部由某种车组成时的流量之比。定义了聚类车辆折算系数:组成该类车型的所有自然车的微观折算系数与组成比例的乘积之和。定义了宏观车辆折算系数:组成混合交通流的所有自然车的微观折算系数与组成比例的乘积之和。计算了这三种车辆折算系数。     

Autonomous cars: The tension between occupant experience and intersection capacity

Systems that enable high levels of vehicle-automation are now beginning to enter the commercial marketplace. Road vehicles capable of operating independently of real-time human control under an increasing set of circumstances will likely become more widely available in the near future. Such vehicles are expected to bring a variety of benefits. Two such anticipated advantages (relative to human-driver vehicle control) are said to be increased road network capacity and the freeing up of the driver-occupant’s time to engage in their choice of leisurely or economically-productive (non-driving) tasks.In this study we investigate the implications for intersection capacity and level-of-service of providing occupants of automated (without real-time human control), autonomously-operating (without vehicle-to-X communication) cars with ride quality that is equivalent (in terms of maximum rates of longitudinal and lateral acceleration) to two types of rail systems: [urban] light rail transit and [inter-urban] high-speed rail. The literature suggests that car passengers start experiencing discomfort at lower rates of acceleration than car drivers; it is therefore plausible that occupants of an autonomously-operating vehicle may wish to instruct their vehicle to maneuver in a way that provides them greater ride comfort than if the vehicle-control algorithm simply mimicked human-driving-operation.On the basis of traffic microsimulation analysis, we found that restricting the dynamics of autonomous cars to the acceleration/deceleration characteristics of both rail systems leads to reductions in a signalized intersection’s vehicle-processing capacity and increases in delay. The impacts were found to be larger when constraining the autonomous cars’ dynamics to the more-restrictive acceleration/deceleration profile of high-speed rail. The scenarios we analyzed must be viewed as boundary conditions, because autonomous cars’ dynamics were by definition never allowed to exceed the acceleration/deceleration constraints of the rail systems. Appropriate evidence regarding motorists’ preferences does not exist at present; establishing these preferences is an important item for the future research agenda.This paper concludes with a brief discussion of research needs to advance this line of inquiry.