全文获取类型
收费全文 | 2218篇 |
免费 | 76篇 |
专业分类
公路运输 | 1180篇 |
综合类 | 613篇 |
水路运输 | 139篇 |
铁路运输 | 235篇 |
综合运输 | 127篇 |
出版年
2024年 | 3篇 |
2023年 | 10篇 |
2022年 | 30篇 |
2021年 | 57篇 |
2020年 | 80篇 |
2019年 | 39篇 |
2018年 | 29篇 |
2017年 | 38篇 |
2016年 | 46篇 |
2015年 | 93篇 |
2014年 | 208篇 |
2013年 | 119篇 |
2012年 | 214篇 |
2011年 | 248篇 |
2010年 | 191篇 |
2009年 | 155篇 |
2008年 | 138篇 |
2007年 | 176篇 |
2006年 | 156篇 |
2005年 | 100篇 |
2004年 | 47篇 |
2003年 | 26篇 |
2002年 | 14篇 |
2001年 | 30篇 |
2000年 | 12篇 |
1999年 | 7篇 |
1998年 | 8篇 |
1997年 | 5篇 |
1996年 | 1篇 |
1995年 | 4篇 |
1994年 | 5篇 |
1993年 | 1篇 |
1991年 | 2篇 |
1988年 | 1篇 |
1987年 | 1篇 |
排序方式: 共有2294条查询结果,搜索用时 15 毫秒
11.
基于Cross-efficiency DEA的中间站运营绩效分析 总被引:1,自引:1,他引:0
朱昌锋 《铁道科学与工程学报》2010,7(6)
根据传统DEA存在的局限性,在有关文献研究的基础上,提出了基于Cross-efficiency DEA模型的中间站绩效分析方法,在调查收集影响中间站运营绩效基础数据的基础上,利用灰色关联分析法提取了评价指标体系,采用Cross-efficiency DEA模型对中间站运营绩效进行了分析、评价和测算,并运用MATLAB软件编程进行了求解,获得了各中间站源配置效率的排序,在对非DEA有效的决策单元进行投影分析的基础上,识别出影响决策单元运营绩效的关键因素,为改进非DEA有效决策单元提供了一个可行方案.最后利用实例验证了该模型的有效性、科学性,分析结果表明:Cross-efficiency DEA模型基本能够反映决策单元运行效率的现实状况. 相似文献
12.
为有效应对轨道交通网络化运营初期可能出现的客流拥挤等问题,运用行人仿真方法进行客流组织方案的动态检验和调整。以深圳会展中心站为例,选取适当的仿真参数和评价指标,对车站客流组织进行防真,分析客流拥堵原因,提出客流组织调整方案,并对调整方案进行仿真及评阶。总结了车站行人仿真在指导车站客流组织方面的普遍适用性。 相似文献
13.
14.
15.
后置发动机城市公交车冷却系统的定性分析 总被引:4,自引:0,他引:4
简要介绍后置发动机城市公交客车冷却系统的布置结构,定性分析影响后置发动机城市公交客车冷却系统散热效果的各种原因,明确提高冷却系统散热效果的途径以及设计中的处理建议、注意事项等。 相似文献
16.
17.
遗传算法在区段站到发线的应用研究 总被引:4,自引:2,他引:4
青学江 《西南交通大学学报》1998,33(4):387-393
为解决车站到发线的合理运用问题,采用遗传算建立了到发线运用的染色体结构和适应度函数,对这种复杂的非线性组合优化问题进行了仿真。 相似文献
18.
Bus Priority Using pre-signals 总被引:2,自引:0,他引:2
The need to provide efficient public transport services in urban areas has led to the implementation of bus priority measures in many congested cities. Much interest has recently centred on priority at signal controlled junctions, including the concept of pre-signals, where traffic signals are installed at or near the end of a with-flow bus lane to provide buses with priority access to the downstream junction. Although a number of pre-signals have now been installed in the U.K., particularly in London, there has been very little published research into their design, operation and optimisation. This paper addresses these points through the development of analytical procedures which allow pre-implementation evaluation of specific categories of pre-signals. The paper initially sets out three categories of pre-signal, which have different operating characteristics, different requirements for signalling and different impacts on capacity and delay. Key issues concerning signalling arrangements for these categories are then discussed, together with a summary of the analytical approach adopted and the assumptions required. Equations are developed to allow appropriate signal timings to be calculated for pre-signalised intersections. Further equations are then developed to enable delays to priority and non-priority traffic, with and without pre-signals, to be estimated with delay being taken here as the key performance criterion. The paper concludes with three application examples illustrating how the equations are applied and the impacts of pre-signals in different situations.The analyses confirm the potential benefits of pre-signals, where these signals apply to non-priority traffic only. Where buses are also subject to a pre-signal, it is shown that disbenefits to buses can often occur, unless bus detectors are used to gain priority signalling. 相似文献
19.
20.
Transit signal priority (TSP) may be combined with road-space priority (RSP) measures to increase its effectiveness. Previous studies have investigated the combination of TSP and RSP measures, such as TSP with dedicated bus lanes (DBLs) and TSP with queue jump lanes (QJLs). However, in these studies, combined effects are usually not compared with separate effects of each measure. In addition, there is no comprehensive study dedicated to understanding combined effects of TSP and RSP measures. It remains unclear whether combining TSP and RSP measures creates an additive effect where the combined effect of TSP and RSP measures is equal to the sum of their separate effects. The existence of such an additive effect would suggest considerable benefits from combining TSP and RSP measures. This paper explores combined effects of TSP and RSP measures, including TSP with DBLs and TSP with QJLs. Analytical results based on time-space diagrams indicate that at an intersection level, the combined effect on bus delay savings is smaller than the additive effect if there is no nearside bus stop and the traffic condition in the base case is under-saturated or near-saturated. With a near-side bus stop, the combined effect on bus delay savings at an intersection level can be better than the additive effect (or over-additive effect), depending on dwell time, distance from the bus stop to the stop line, traffic demand, and cycle length. In addition, analytical results suggest that at an arterial level, the combined effect on bus delay savings can be the over-additive effect with suitable signal offsets. These results are confirmed by a micro-simulation case study. Combined effects on arterial and side-street traffic delays are also discussed. 相似文献