神经网络和PID控制器在过程控制中的应用

将PID控制器和神经网络相结合，对一种非线性、变参数的受控对象的控制进行研究．仿真结果表明，控制效果令人满意。     

神经网络模拟框架柱低周反复加载试验性能初探

利用神经网络的智能特点，通过对一框架柱在低周反复水平荷载作用下行为的“学习”，来模拟框架柱经受不同荷载历史的性能。模拟结果试验检验，符合良好，表明了用神经网络模拟试验代替部分真实验是可行的。     

一种预测内燃机稳态排放特性的方法

为预测内燃机在额定工况范围内的排放特性，综合利用试验和模拟研究的优势，基于少量有代表性、易于实现的排放试验结果，利用神经网络的非线性映射能力，建立神经网络排放预测模型，研究结果表明该方法是可行的，提供了快速了解内燃机排放特性的手段。     

手写体数字识别的一种模糊神经网络方法

将模糊特征取技术与区组设计前馈网络相结合用于手写体数字识别。实验表明，该方法对５００个未学习样本的识别率达到了９５．８％。这一结果，相当于或优于目前已经发表的先进成果。     

基于MapInfo的城市公交查询系统的设计与实现

研究城市公交查询系统的设计与实现。利用动态分段技术,建立了基于MapInfo的动态分段数据结构,充分考虑乘客出行心理,提出了公交出行最优路径算法,设计了城市公交查询系统,实现输入查询信息或直接对地图操作来获得出行最优路线和换乘方案,提高乘客出行的便利性和高效性。     

An Adaptive Sliding Mode Tracking Controller Using BP Neural Networks for a Class of Large-scale Nonlinear Systems

A new type controller, BP neural-networks-based sliding mode controller is developed for a class of large-scale nonlinear systems with unknown bounds of high-order interconnections in this paper. It is shown that decentralized BP neural networks are used to adaptively learn the uncertainty bounds of interconnected subsystems in the Lyapunov sense, and the outputs of the decentralized BP neural networks are then used as the parameters of the sliding mode controller to compensate for the effects of subsystems uncertainties. Using this scheme, not only strong robustness with respect to uncertainty dynamics and nonlinearities can be obtained, but also the output tracking error between the actual output of each subsystem and the corresponding desired reference output can asymptotically converge to zero. A simulation example is presented to support the validity of the proposed BP neural-networks-based sliding mode controller.     

一种改进的模型参考自适应算法

针对一种模型跟随自适应算法（DS-AMFC），利用线性神经网络预测系统输出与模型输出之差为控制信号的计算提供较准确的偏差值，用该估计的偏差量进行控制。同时，把控制的误差引入控制信号，在输入信号频率较高时仍具有跟随模型的能力，鲁棒性大大提高。     

关于神经计算中满意解的研究

在分析神经计算中已有的满意运算的基础上，找出其中存在的问题，提出了与阈值有关的整体满意度，并对其进行了分析比较，结果表明：整体满意度综合了组合满意度和平均满意度的优点，明显优于后两者。     

一个安全有效的会议密钥分配方案

提出了M．Steiner等人提出的会议密钥分配方案GDH．2存在的安全漏洞，并提出了一个新的安全有效的密钥分配方案，该方案适合多个用户通过不安全的通信网络进行信息交流。相对于GDH．2而言，本文案只以增加很小的计算量和通信负荷为代价，使安全性能得到较大的提高。     

Distance and time in intermodal goods transport networks in Europe: A generic approach

This paper is about distance and time as factors of competitiveness of intermodal transport. It reviews the relevance of the factors, evaluates time models in practice, compares network distances and times in alternative bundling networks with geometrically varied layouts, and points out how these networks perform in terms of vehicle scale, frequency and door-to-door time. The analysis focuses on intermodal transport in Europe, especially intermodal rail transport, but is in search for generic conclusions. The paper does not incorporate the distance and time results in cost models, and draws conclusions for transport innovation, wherever this is possible without cost modelling. For instance, the feature vehicle scale, an important factor of transport costs, is analysed and discussed.Distance and time are important factors of competitiveness of intermodal transport. They generate (direct) vehicle costs and – via transport quality – indirect costs to the customers. Clearly direct costs/prices are the most important performance of the intermodal transport system. The relevance of quality performances is less clarified. Customers emphasise the importance of a good match between the transport and the logistic system. In this framework (time) reliability is valued high. Often transport time, arrival and departure times, and frequency have a lower priority. But such conclusions can hardy be generalised. The range of valuations reflects the heterogeneity of situations. Some lack of clarity is obviously due to overlapping definitions of different performance types.The following parts of the paper are about two central fields of network design, which have a large impact on transport costs and quality, namely the design of vehicle roundtrips (and acceleration of transport speed) and the choice of bundling type: do vehicles provide direct services or run in what we call complex bundling networks? An example is the hub-and-spoke network. The objective of complex bundling is to increase vehicle scale and/or transport frequency even if network volumes are restricted. Complex bundling requires intermediate nodes for the exchange of load units. Examples of complex bundling networks are the hub-and-spoke network or the line network.Roundtrip and bundling design are interrelated policy fields: an acceleration of the roundtrip speed, often desirable from the cost point of view, can often only be carried out customer friendly, if the transport frequency is increased. But often the flow size is not sufficient for a higher frequency. Then a change of bundling model can be an outcome.Complex bundling networks are known to have longer average distances and times, the latter also due to the presence of additional intermediate exchange nodes. However, this disadvantage is – inside the limits of maximal vehicle sizes – overruled by the advantage of a restricted number of network links. Therefore generally, complex bundling networks have shorter total vehicle distances and times. This expression of economies of scale implies lower vehicle costs per load unit.The last part of the paper presents door-to-door times of load units of complex bundling networks and compares them with unimodal road transport. The times of complex bundling networks are larger than that of networks with direct connections, but nevertheless competitive with unimodal road transport, except for short distances.