牵引变电站SVC控制系统的设计

针对因牵引网负荷增加而导致的网压低、功率因数低的现状,结合其电气特性和无功补偿装置的现实条件,研究设计了一种由晶闸管相控电抗器加滤波器(TCR FC)型静止无功补偿器(SVC),介绍了无功功率和控制角的计算以及控制系统软硬件的设计.应用表明:该控制系统精度高、响应快,完全满足变电站改善功率因数并稳定牵引网电压的需要.     

莱钢厂区复杂环境石方深孔控制爆破技术及经济分析

介绍莱钢厂区复杂环境深孔控制爆破技术和施工技术措施,对爆破效果和对周围环境的影响、危害程度进行严格控制,提高准爆率和爆破效率,降低炸药单耗,严格控制石块粒径,以达到加快施工进度,降低成本,提高经济效益,保证安全和质量的目的,为类似工程施工和预算提供参考。     

电控共轨式喷射系统喷油过程的试验研究

叙述了柴油机电控共轨式喷射系统喷油过程的试验装置及原理，实测了HEUI—A液压增压式喷油器的喷油规律，并对共轨压力和喷油脉宽与喷油量、预喷射和喷油率之间的依存关系进行了综合分析。     

高压共轨喷油器精密偶件的泄漏分析

高压共轨电控喷油系统中，随着燃油喷射压力的大幅度提高，燃油的粘度-压力效应、粘度-温度效应凸显。作者分析了高压共轨喷油器精密偶件中的泄漏问题，得出的结论是：考虑了燃油的粘压效应、粘温效应后实际的泄漏量并不十分严重；如果考虑油液的极化效应、进口起始段的效应以及环形槽的影响，实际泄漏量可能还会减小。     

可控硅程序控制配料装置

应用可控硅控制技术,对物料配料计量生产流程进行程序控制,可以改善处在粉尘较多及计量要求较频繁工作环境下的配料控制工作.针对自动配料计量控制电路的工作原理及其调节方法进行了较详细的叙述,该装置使用在水泥建材生产配料流程及建筑施工物料配料流程中,具有结构简单、系统运行性能可靠、配料计量调整范围大、误差率小等使用效果.     

微机控制点火系的检修方法

微机控制点火系的种类有3种,然而根据其结构设计不同又可以把点火系统分为6种,其检修方法各有不同,本文重点介绍点火系统的具体检测维修方法。     

车用柴油机电控开发系统的软,硬件设计及应用

本文研制了一种新的发动机电 控燃油系统的开发系统的微机测控系统。     

基于层次分析法的区间估计的车站能力查定误差因子分析研究

本文归纳总结了车站能力查定计算过程中存在的多种影响因素,深入分析了其产生原因和不可避免性。然后利用层次分析法的区间估计方法计算得出各种误差因子对计算结果的影响权重大小,并对比不同误差因子的权重区间,筛选出强误差因子,剔除弱误差因子,为精确计算车站能力值提供依据。     

微差爆破技术在广州地铁施工中的应用

介绍广州市轨道交通5号线珠江新城站—猎德站区间采用的微差控制爆破施工技术,控制爆破各技术参数的选取和施工工艺的控制及取得的工程效果。     

Using GPS-data to determine optimum electric vehicle ranges: A Michigan case study

Fuel-switching personal transportation from gasoline to electricity offers many advantages, including lower noise, zero local air pollution, and petroleum-independence. But alleviations of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions are more nuanced, due to many factors, including the car’s battery range. We use GPS-based trip data to determine use type-specific, GHG-optimized ranges. The dataset comprises 412 cars and 384,869 individual trips in Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA. We use previously developed algorithms to determine driver types, such as using the car to commute or not. Calibrating an existing life cycle GHG model to a forecast, low-carbon grid for Ann Arbor, we find that the optimum range varies not only with the drive train architecture (plugin-hybrid versus battery-only) and charging technology (fast versus slow) but also with the driver type. Across the 108 scenarios we investigated, the range that yields lowest GHG varies from 65 km (55+ year old drivers, ultrafast charging, plugin-hybrid) to 158 km (16–34 year old drivers, overnight charging, battery-only). The optimum GHG reduction that electric cars offer – here conservatively measured versus gasoline-only hybrid cars – is fairly stable, between 29% (16–34 year old drivers, overnight charging, battery-only) and 46% (commuters, ultrafast charging, plugin-hybrid). The electrification of total distances is between 66% and 86%. However, if cars do not have the optimum range, these metrics drop substantially. We conclude that matching the range to drivers’ typical trip distances, charging technology, and drivetrain is a crucial pre-requisite for electric vehicles to achieve their highest potential to reduce GHG emissions in personal transportation.