客运专线列车运行方式分析

客运专线采用了一系列新技术设备,动车组列车运行速度高,与既有线相比,客运专线的行车组织方式有其独有的特点。介绍了我国客运专线采用的列车运行控制系统及动车组列车的控车模式,从列车调度员直接指挥行车作业、设置临时限速、调度命令作为行车凭证等方面论述了调度集中的行车组织方式,阐述了跨线运输的概念,分析了动车组列车和普通旅客列车跨线运行的范围和技术条件,并针对目前执行的客运专线技术管理办法提出了建议。     

成都轨道交通环线客流特征分析及运营模式研究

针对轨道交通环线大多采用的"鱼刺图"客流断面表达形式及内外环对称开行的运营模式存在的问题,通过运用国内首创的环形客流断面图对环线客流特征进行直观表达,在此基础上对其运营组织模式进行研究并提出不同的运营模式供灵活选择,以期对后续其他城市环线的设计提供参考。研究结论:(1)环线有别于放射性线路具有明显的客流特征差异,运用环形客流断面图方式,可读性和直观性更强。(2)根据环线的不同客流特征提出内外环对称、内外环不对称、大小交路、单向收发车4种运营模式。4种运营模式各有自身的适应性,在具体项目应用时应结合实际线路沿线站点情况及客流特征进行进一步研究比选。     

浅谈客运专线会议电视系统发展

根据客运专线建设的具体现状,浅谈会议电视系统的H.323和H.320两大标准的差别,分析会议电视系统建设方案选择,并探讨未来客运专线的会议电视系统的发展。     

香港地铁自动售检票系统运营管理分析

通过赴香港地铁考察的经历,基于香港地铁AFC自动售检票系统多年运营的经验,分析香港地铁的换乘模式、设备个性化以及票务管理模式。着重从人性化细节服务的设置情况,分析香港地铁一切以乘客为中心的宗旨,并阐述ERP在香港地铁的成功应用。     

波罗轿车的被动安全性设计综述

被动安全性是轿车开发中的一项重要内容，对于小型轿车由于其车身尺寸较小，显得更加重要。波罗轿车的被动安全性设计是建立在大众公司多年公司多年来对全世界各种碰撞安全法规和交通事故的研究基础之上，涵盖了正面、偏置、侧面、后部、翻滚以及车对车碰撞等各个方面，为小型轿车的被动安全性树立了典范。     

凌志LS430轿车电动倾斜和伸缩转向柱的故障诊断与维修

介绍了2001款凌志LS430型轿车电动倾斜与伸缩转向柱的组成和功能。该转向柱系统具有故障自诊断功能。介绍了故障码B2602钥匙开锁警告开关电路故障、故障码B2610倾斜位置传感器或电动机电路故障等的诊断。另外，介绍了执行器电源电路和ECU电源电路、倾斜电动机和伸缩电动机电路等的俭修     

利用公交通行能力解决公交问题的探讨

分析我国公交的发展,指出在我国发展公交的道路上缺乏对公交通行能力这一重要指标的思考,提出研究公交通行能力来解决我国公交运营中存在的问题,并建立公交(包括公交车辆和公交乘客)通行能力模型。然后以北京中关村大街的公交专用道为实例,从公交通行能力方面分析该段道路公交车拥堵、混乱产生的原因,然后根据实际情况提出解决措施。     

车辆折算系数的分类及算法

提出了标准车的选择原则:车长等于约定的长度;当交通流密度很小时,以道路设计速度行驶;驾驶员遵守交通规则。定义了微观车辆折算系数:交通流全部由标准车组成时的流量与交通流全部由某种车组成时的流量之比。定义了聚类车辆折算系数:组成该类车型的所有自然车的微观折算系数与组成比例的乘积之和。定义了宏观车辆折算系数:组成混合交通流的所有自然车的微观折算系数与组成比例的乘积之和。计算了这三种车辆折算系数。     

Implementation and application of a stochastic aircraft boarding model

The aircraft turnaround processes is mainly controlled by the ground handling, airport or airline staff, except the aircraft boarding, which is driven by the passengers’ experience and willingness or ability to follow the proposed boarding procedures. The paper uses a prior developed, calibrated, stochastic aircraft boarding model, which is applied to different boarding strategies (chronological order of passenger arrival, hand luggage handling), group constellations and innovative infrastructural changes (Flying Carpet, Side-Slip Seat, Foldable Passenger Seat). In this context, passenger boarding is assumed to be a stochastic, agent-based, forward-directed, one-dimensional and discrete process. The stochastic model covers individual passenger behavior as well as operational constraints and deviations. A comprehensive assessment using one model allows for efficient comparison of current research approaches and innovative operational solutions for efficient passenger boarding.     

Investigation of tailpipe and evaporative emissions from China IV and Tier 2 passenger vehicles with different gasolines

The limited understanding of vehicular emissions in China, especially evaporative emissions, is one obstacle to establishing tighter standards. To evaluate tailpipe and evaporative emissions, two typical China IV vehicles and one Tier 2 vehicle with an onboard refuelling vapour recovery (ORVR) system were selected and tested. One of the China IV vehicles was fuelled with gasoline, E10 and M15, respectively, to investigate the effect of fuel properties on vehicular emissions. For each vehicle, cold-start tailpipe emission tests were conducted first, followed by an evaporation test. Based on the emission factors and real-world vehicle activity data, the annual tailpipe and evaporative hydrocarbon (HC) emissions of each vehicle were calculated and compared. The results show that E10 and M15 significantly reduced the tailpipe CO and particle number (PN) emissions but seriously aggravated the NOx emissions, especially for M15. The hot soak losses (HSLs) and diurnal breathing losses (DBLs) were slightly impacted by the fuel properties. The annual evaporative emissions with E10 and M15 were higher than that with gasoline. The ORVR system effectively controlled the evaporative emissions, especially for DBLs. Evaporative emissions from the China IV vehicles were 1.1–1.4 times the tailpipe HC emissions. Additionally, the evaporative emission factors of the China IV vehicles were almost 50% lower than the standard (2.0 g/test), whereas their annual evaporative emissions were almost 1.8–2.8 times higher than those from the Tier 2 vehicle. Therefore, controlling evaporative emissions currently remains a great need in China, and the ORVR might be a recommended evaporative control technology.