Maneuvering simulations of pusher-barge systems

Pusher-barge systems were studied in nine different configurations. Captive model tests were performed at the Hiroshima University Towing Tank and the hydrodynamic derivatives for the various configurations were obtained. At a service speed of 7 knots, pusher-barge systems with the same number of barges but arranged in a row (shorter length overall but with a larger breadth) require more power to operate than those that were arranged in a line. When the length overall increased, the tactical diameter, advance, and transfer distances also increased, mainly due to the significant increase in the moment of inertia when barges are arranged in a line, rather than in a row. All pusher-barge systems had small first and second overshoot angles. Pusher-barge systems with the same number of barges had a longer response time to the rudder angle of attack and required a longer stopping distance when arranged in a line, mainly due to the increased moment of inertia and reduced resistance when barges are arranged in this way.     

Hydrodynamic derivatives investigation of unconventionally arranged pusher-barge systems

Unconventional arrangements of pusher-barge systems were studied in this paper. Pusher-barge systems consisting of 4, 6, and 8 barges with one pusher were tested in various combinations. Captive model testing was performed on the various combinations at the Hiroshima University towing tank. Hydrodynamic derivatives of the systems were obtained from the model test data by using the least-square analysis method. For asymmetric conditions, the hydrodynamic derivatives and N′_ββ were added to the force and moment equations in order to obtain better fitting of the least-square curves. Motion equations were modified to cover the asymmetric cases of pusher-barge systems with lateral force and yaw moment due to the asymmetry arrangement. Turning simulations (with 20° sudden angle change) were carried out and a comparison of advance distance and tactical diameter made. An erratum to this article can be found at