首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

地基比例系数m值对比研究
引用本文:郭海强,罗一农,邱永平,王占盛,谢清泉.地基比例系数m值对比研究[J].路基工程,2019,0(4):1-6.
作者姓名:郭海强  罗一农  邱永平  王占盛  谢清泉
作者单位:中铁二院工程集团有限责任公司,成都,610031;西南交通大学土木工程学院,成都,610031
基金项目:国家重点研发计划课题:中国标准走出去适用性技术研究(2016YFF0202903);公司、企业计划研究课题:可靠性设计标准指标体系的统一性研究(KYY2018075(18-20))
摘    要:地基比例系数m值对桩身的受力及变形有一定影响,但国内多个行业标准所给出的地基比例系数m值差异较大。针对该问题,首先,对各行业标准及专著进行系统性的梳理,并总结出四类地基比例系数m值;其次,对四类地基比例系数m值之间进行横向对比;最后,以桩板墙结构为例,对比分析四类地基比例系数m值所计算出的锚固段长度,结果表明采用《铁路路基支挡结构设计规范》的水平地基比例系数m值,较其它三类偏低,锚固段长度偏长。

关 键 词:m法  地基比例系数m值  锚固点位移  桩板墙  水平荷载
收稿时间:2019-11-11

Contrastive Study on m Value of Proportional Coefficient of Foundation Coefficient
Abstract:The m value of proportional coefficient of foundation coefficient has certain effect on the force and deformation of pile; however, there exists great difference on the m value among Chinese codes of industries. Herein firstly, on the basis of systematic collating of industry standards and monographs, four types of m-value of proportional coefficient were summarized; secondly, horizontal comparison was conducted between these m values; finally, with the example of pile-plank wall structure, the length of anchorage section calculated by these m values were compared and analyzed. The result shows that the m value of proportional coefficient of horizontal foundation in line with Design Code for Railway Subgrade Retaining Structure is lower than the other three types, and the relatively longer anchorage section is provided.
Keywords:
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《路基工程》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《路基工程》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号