首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


A monopolistic market for advanced traveller information systems and road use efficiency
Affiliation:1. Department of Spatial Economics, VU University Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1105, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands;2. Tinbergen Institute, Gustav Mahlerplein 117, 1082 MS Amsterdam, The Netherlands;3. Departamento de Ingeniería de Transporte y Logística, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Av. Vicuña Mackenna 4860, Santiago, Chile;4. Instituto de Economía, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Av. Vicuña Mackenna 4860, Santiago, Chile;1. School of Economics and Management, Fuzhou University, PR China;2. School of Business Administration, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, PR China
Abstract:Advanced traveller information systems (ATIS) are likely to exhibit significant economies of scale in production and operation. Private provision would therefore typically occur under considerable market power. An important policy question is whether the resulting distortions would aggravate or reduce distortions in the transport market itself, notably external effects such as congestion. We consider such questions by presenting an integrated model that captures the interactions between a congested transport market and a monopolistic market for advanced traveller information systems (ATIS). Three market failures operate simultaneously: congestion on the road, a declining average benefit of information when information penetration rises, and monopolistic pricing by the provider of information. Some key results are as follows. Monopoly information pricing appears not to be the most attractive option from a system efficiency viewpoint. A subsidy in the information market can help realise a second-best optimum of road use. Relatively low uncertainty on the road and high information costs limit the monopolist’s profit on the information market, as well as relative system efficiency. While relatively inelastic demand for mobility, counter intuitively, negatively affects the monopolist’s profit, the relative social benefits from private information peak at intermediate demand elasticities.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号