Integrating transport and land-use planning? How steering cultures in local authorities affect implementation of integrated public transport and land-use planning |
| |
| Institution: | 1. Institute of Transport Economics, Norway;2. Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute, Sweden;1. School of Transportation Science and Engineering, Beijing Key Laboratory for Cooperative Vehicle Infrastructure System and Safety Control, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China;2. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of South Florida, FL 33620, United States;3. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle 98195, United States;1. Transport Studies Unit (TSU), School of Geography and the Environment (SoGE), University of Oxford (U.K.), South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QY, United Kingdom;2. Department of Geology, Geography and Environmental Sciences, University of Alcala, C/Colegios n°2, Cp 28801 Alcalá de Henares, Spain;3. Department of Geography and Spatial Planning, University of Zaragoza, C/Pedro Cerbuna 12, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain;1. Institute of High Performance Computing, 1 Fusionopolis Way, #16-16 Connexis North, Singapore 138632, Singapore;2. Rolls-Royce Singapore Pte. Ltd., Advanced Technology Centre, 6 Seletar Aerospace Rise, Singapore 797575, Singapore;3. Complexity Institute, Nanyang Technological University, 50 Nanyang Avenue, Singapore 639798, Singapore |
| |
| Abstract: | Previous research has shown integrated planning to be important for achieving aims concerning more environmentally friendly transport operations, but less good at explaining prerequisites of implementation. This paper analyses how management and working practises in local authorities, here understood as steering cultures, affect implementation of integrated land-use and public transport planning approaches. The analysis builds on case studies of planning in two Swedish municipalities. These have developed two antithetical steering cultures, namely one that can be described as deliberative and one that can be described as sectorised. The paper describes the advantages and disadvantages of these steering cultures. The findings show the deliberative model to facilitate integration through advanced mechanisms of consensus and co-ordination between policy-makers and officials. The sectorised model has no such mechanisms, but this need not result in poor prospects of integrated planning. It is important for integrated planning approaches, whatever the steering culture, to be in line with the institutionalised norms and objectives by which planning practices are governed. Integration therefore needs a normative component, so as to ensure implementation. The important normative component in this context can be construed as discourses and rationales concerning transport and the urban development of which public transport forms part. |
| |
| Keywords: | Integrated planning Policy integration Land use Public transport Sustainable mobility |
| 本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录！ |
|
