某车型FMVSS214与E-NCAP侧面柱碰撞差异 |
| |
引用本文: | 侯福震 张世凯 金龙,等. 某车型FMVSS214与E-NCAP侧面柱碰撞差异[J]. 汽车工程师, 2014, 0(4): 39-42 |
| |
作者姓名: | 侯福震 张世凯 金龙 等 |
| |
作者单位: | [1]长城汽车股份有限公司技术中心 [2]河北省汽车工程技术研究中心 |
| |
摘 要: | 侧面柱碰撞是新车评价规程中的重点考察项目.从试验工况、车体响应及假人伤害等方面对比了FMVSS 214侧面柱碰撞与E-NCAP侧面柱碰撞的差异性,分析2种试验假人易受伤害的部位及原因.经验证,2种碰撞试验可以使用同一点火策略;由于FMVSS 214侧面柱碰撞速度更高,碰撞位置更靠前,要求侧气囊保压时间更长,覆盖面积更大,建议使用带主动泄气孔的产品,并加强车门结构,以降低对假人胸部、腹部以及骨盆的伤害.
|
关 键 词: | FMVSS 214侧面柱 E-NCAP侧面柱 碰撞试验 假人伤害 |
On Difference between FMVSS 214 Side Pole and Euro-NCAP Side Pole |
| |
Abstract: | Side pole collision is an important item in NCAP. For the side pole, the difference between FMVSS 214 and E-NCAP from the aspects of test working condition, body response and dummy injury is described in this paper, and for 2 different test dummies, the part where is easy to damage and injury reason is also introduced in the paper. After test validation, the same ignition method can he used in 2 different collision tests. The collision speed stipulated in FMVSS 214 is much higher, the collision position is further front eompared with E-NCAP, therefore the lasting time for keeping the stable pressure of airbag is required longer, and the protection area is much larger. The side pole with active outlet is require to use, and the body structure improvement need to reduce injuries of dummy in chest, abdominal and pelvis. |
| |
Keywords: | FMVSS 214 side pole Euro-NCAP Side Pole Collision test Dummy injury |
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录! |
|