首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

流体自由界面追踪方法对比研究
引用本文:王韬.流体自由界面追踪方法对比研究[J].武汉理工大学学报(交通科学与工程版),2012,36(2):433-436.
作者姓名:王韬
作者单位:天津大学管理学院 天津300072;天津港地产发展有限公司 天津300461
摘    要:流体自由界面追踪方法研究是近年来计算流体力学的热门课题,已有多种方法提出.文中对有代表性的VOF方法和Level Set界面追踪方法进行了比较.根据各种算法对旋转和剪切2种虚拟流场中界面演化的追踪结果,探讨了各种方法的准确性.计算结果表明,与VOF方法相比较,Level Set方法,特别是粒子level set方法能够更好地捕捉运动界面.

关 键 词:自由界面追踪  VOF法  Level  Set法

Comparison of Free Surface Tracking Methods
Wang Tao.Comparison of Free Surface Tracking Methods[J].journal of wuhan university of technology(transportation science&engineering),2012,36(2):433-436.
Authors:Wang Tao
Institution:Wang Tao1,2) (School of Management,Tianjin University,Tianjin 300072,China)1) (Tianjin Port Real Estate Development Conpany,Tianjin 300461,China)2)
Abstract:In recent years,free surface tracking method attracts more and more interests of the researchers and several kinds of method have been presented.In this paper,the most representative three methods of VOF approach and three methods of Level Set approach will be studied by making comparison of each methods in terms of their precision and computational time consumed in two idealized calculation samples,one is a rotational flow field and the other is a shear flow field,respectively.The final results show that level set method,especially particle level set method,can more accurately capture the moving interface compared with VOF method.
Keywords:free surface tracking  VOF method  Level Set method
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号