首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Taxi apps,regulation, and the market for taxi journeys
Institution:1. Institute for Resources, Environment and Sustainability, 2202 Main Mall, University of British Columbia, Vancouver V6T 1Z4, Canada;2. Food and Resource Economics, Land and Food Systems, MacMillan 341, 2357 Main Mall, University of British Columbia, Vancouver V6T 1Z4, Canada;1. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA;2. University of Queensland, Australia;3. Queensland University of Technology, Australia;1. University of Louisville, Management Department, College of Business, Louisville, KY, 40292, USA;2. Boise State University, College of Business and Economics, 1910 University Drive, Boise, ID, 83725, USA;1. Department of City and Regional Planning, University of California, Berkeley 228 Wurster Hall #1850, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA;2. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Berkeley 408 McLaughlin Hall, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA;3. Transportation Sustainability Research Center, University of California, Berkeley 1301 South 46th Street, Building 190, Richmond, CA 94804, USA
Abstract:This paper attempts to provide a starting point for discussion on how smartphone-based taxi applications (‘apps’) have changed the market for taxi journeys and the resulting implications for taxi market regulation. The paper focuses on the taxi apps and their impact on taxi markets. It provides a brief history of taxi regulation before outlining the underlying economic rationales of its current form in many parts of the world, characterised as the “QQE” framework (quantity, quality and economic controls on operators). It argues that current regulation assumes that taxi markets are subject to three sets of problems that require correction by regulatory intervention, namely: those associated with credence goods, problems related to open access and those resulting from transactions occurring in a thin market. It is then proposed that taxi apps solve both the credence good and thin market problems whilst largely mitigating the problems associated with open access. The paper then presents some potential problems for taxi apps, namely the potential for instability on supply and demand sides, collusion and monopoly. It also discusses concerns about driver background checks and safety. The paper concludes by arguing that instead of restricting the growth of the taxi market, regulators should focus on reducing the likelihood of monopoly and collusion in a taxi market led by apps.
Keywords:Taxi  Apps  Regulations  Uber  Credence  Thin market
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号