首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

高速公路互通立交出口匝道安全评价
引用本文:李光,李志勇,袁杰,徐英.高速公路互通立交出口匝道安全评价[J].中南公路工程,2012(5):64-67.
作者姓名:李光  李志勇  袁杰  徐英
作者单位:[1]湖南省衡桂高速公路建设开发有限公司,湖南衡阳421001 [2]湖南省交通科学研究院,湖南长沙410015
摘    要:鉴于高速公路互通立交出口匝道交通事故频发的现状,分别采用基于公路安全评价指南和基于汽车行驶动力学的前、后两种方法对某高速公路出口匝道工程实例进行安全评价,然后对比前、后两种评价方法的异同,并分析基于交通心理学的速度感知误差对两种方法评价结果的影响。结果表明:相对于前者评价方法而言,后种评价方法的安全标准偏低;采用前者评价方法计算得到的互通立交出口匝道运行速度明显偏大,不满足行驶平衡的要求,即前者方法用于计算出口匝道的运行速度存在适应性问题;速度感知误差对后者评价方法判断结论的影响程度大于前者方法;出口匝道宜综合前、后两种方法进行安全评价。

关 键 词:高速公路  互通立交  出口匝道  交通安全

Safety Evaluation of Off-ramp in Highway Interchange
LI Guang,LI Zhiyong,YUAN Jie,XU Ying.Safety Evaluation of Off-ramp in Highway Interchange[J].Central South Highway Engineering,2012(5):64-67.
Authors:LI Guang  LI Zhiyong  YUAN Jie  XU Ying
Institution:1. Hunan Henggui Expressway Construction Development Company Ltd, Hengyang, Hunan 421001, China; 2. Hunan Communications Research Institute, Changsha, Hunan 410015, China)
Abstract:As abundant traffic accident happened at off-ramp in highway interchange, two traffic safety evaluation method were compared through a project case,which is based on highway safety assess- ment guide and vehicle driving dynamics, then the evaluation results of the two methods were compared, the speed perception error effects on these two evaluation results were also compared. As a result, the following conclusions were reached: compared with the former method, the requirements of the latter method are more easily to be satisfied ; it is inappropriate to calculate operating speed of off-ramp by the former method ;the speed perception error effect on the latter method' s result is larger than the former method; it is suggested to combine the two methods to evaluate the traffic safety of off-ramp.
Keywords:highway  interchange  off-ramp  Traffic safety
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号