首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


On a pathway to de-carbonization – A comparison of new passenger car CO2 emission standards and taxation measures in the G20 countries
Institution:1. School of Environment, and State Key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution Control, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China;2. State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Sources and Control of Air Pollution Complex, Beijing 100084, China;3. Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA;4. Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China;5. International Consultant, Arlington, VA 22207, USA;6. Research and Advanced Engineering, Ford Motor Company, 2101 Village Road, Dearborn, MI 48121-2053, USA;7. Sibley School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA;8. International Laboratory for Air Quality and Health, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland 4001, Australia
Abstract:Considering the role of transport for a 1.5 Degree stabilization pathway and the importance of light-duty vehicle fuel efficiency within that, it is important to understand the key elements of a policy package to shape the energy efficiency of the vehicle fleet. This paper presents an analysis focusing on three types of policy measures: (1) CO2 emission standards for new vehicles, (2) vehicle taxation directly and indirectly based on CO2 emission levels, and (3) fuel taxation. The paper compares the policies in the G20 economies and estimates the financial impact of those policies using the example of a Ford Focus vehicle model. This analysis is a contribution to the assessment of the role of the transport sector in global decarbonisation efforts. The findings of this paper show that only an integrated approach of regulatory and fiscal policy measures can yield substantial efficiency gains in the vehicle fleet and can curb vehicle kilometres travelled by individual motorised transport. Using the illustrative example of one vehicle model, the case study analysis shows that isolated measures, e.g. fuel efficiency regulation without corresponding fuel and vehicle taxes only have minor CO2 emission reduction effects and that policy measures need to be combined in order to achieve substantial emission reduction gains over time. The analysis shows that the highest level of impact is achieved by a combination regulatory and fiscal policies rather than only one policy even if this policy is more aggressive. When estimating the quantitative effect of fuel efficiency standards, vehicle and fuel tax, the analysis shows that substantial gains with regard to CO2 emission are only achieved at a financial impact level above 500 Euros over a four year period.
Keywords:Transport  Policy  Regulation  Fuel tax  Vehicle tax
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号