首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Electric vehicle park-charge-ride programs: A planning framework and case study in Chicago
Institution:1. School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 639798, Singapore;2. Faculty of Business, University of Greenwich, London SE10 9LS, UK;1. Florida State University, Department of Urban and Regional Planning, 353 Bellamy, Tallahassee, FL 32306-2280, United States;2. Virginia Department of Transportation, United States;1. Ningbo University of Technology, Ningbo, China;2. Department of Spatial Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, Australia;3. School of Computer Science and Security Science, Edith Cowan University, Perth, Australia;1. School of Urban Railway Transportation, Shanghai University of Engineering Science, Shanghai 201620, China;2. Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117576, Singapore;3. School of Economics and Management, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
Abstract:In suburban areas, combining the use of electric vehicles (EV) and transit systems in an EV Park-Charge-Ride (PCR) approach can potentially help improve transit accessibility, facilitate EV charging and adoption, and reduce the need for long-distance driving and ensuing impacts. Despite the anticipated growth of EV adoption and charging demand, PCR programs are limited. With a focus on multi-modal trips, this study proposes a generic planning process that integrates EV infrastructure development with transit systems, develops a systematic assessment approach to fostering the PCR adoption, and illustrates a case implementation in Chicago. Specifically, this study develops a Suitability Index (SI) for EV charging locations at parking spots that are suitable for both EV charging and transit connections. SI can be customized for short-term and long-term planning scenarios. SI values are derived in Chicago as an example for (1) commuter rail stations (for work trips), and (2) shopping centers near transit stops as potential opportunities for additional weekday parking and EV charging (for multi-purpose trips/MPT). Furthermore, carbon emissions and vehicle miles travelled (VMT) across various travel modes and trip scenarios (i.e., work trips and MPT) are calculated. Compared to the baseline of driving a conventional vehicle, this study found that an EV PCR commuter can reduce up to 87% of personal VMT and 52% of carbon emissions. A more active role of the public sector in the PCR program development is recommended.
Keywords:Infrastructure planning  Multi-modal trips  Electric Vehicles (EV)  Transit stations  Multi-purpose trips  Environmental impacts
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号