首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

生命周期视角下货运通道能耗测度与节能潜力分析
引用本文:诸立超,甄伟,刘昭然. 生命周期视角下货运通道能耗测度与节能潜力分析[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(1): 24-29. DOI: 10.16097/j.cnki.1009-6744.2022.01.003
作者姓名:诸立超  甄伟  刘昭然
作者单位:1. 浙江财经大学,a. 工商管理学院,b. 经济学院,杭州 310018;2. 国家发展和改革委员会综合运输研究所,北京 100038
基金项目:浙江省哲学社会科学规划课题;浙江省自然科学基金;国家自然科学基金
摘    要:货运能耗的系统测度和节能潜力分析,对制定有效的节能策略至关重要。本文从生命周期视角出发,构建货运能耗系统测度和节能潜力分析框架,量化供给侧和需求侧各因素对货运能耗的影响,从而识别关键因素。鉴于不同区域资源禀赋及货运供需特征差异,将该框架应用于义乌-宁波集装箱货运通道。结果表明:忽视生命周期和运输链次要活动,特别是前者,会显著低估货运能耗,导致各节能策略真实贡献评估有偏;综合能耗的公路运输直接能耗弹性为0.67,远高于供给侧和需求侧其他能耗影响因素,是中短期货运节能的重中之重;现有条件下“公转铁”策略单独实施的节能效果欠佳,建议中短期搭配直接能耗节能策略,而中长期宜搭配间接能耗节能策略。

关 键 词:综合运输  货运能耗  能耗测度  节能潜力  供给侧  需求侧  
收稿时间:2021-08-03

Energy Consumption Measurement and Energy-saving Potential Analysis of Freight Corridors from Perspective of Life Cycle
ZHU Li-chao,ZHEN Wei,LIU Zhao-ran. Energy Consumption Measurement and Energy-saving Potential Analysis of Freight Corridors from Perspective of Life Cycle[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2022, 22(1): 24-29. DOI: 10.16097/j.cnki.1009-6744.2022.01.003
Authors:ZHU Li-chao  ZHEN Wei  LIU Zhao-ran
Affiliation:1.a. School of Business Administration, 1b. School of Economics, Zhejiang University of Finance & Economics,Hangzhou 310018, China; 2. Institute of Comprehensive Transportation of National Development and ReformCommission, Beijing 100038, China
Abstract:Systematic energy consumption measurement and energy-saving potential analysis of freight transportationare crucial to formulating energy-efficient strategies. An analysis framework for energy consumption measurement andenergy- saving potential of freight transportation is constructed from life cycle perspective to quantify the impact ofvarious supply-side and demand-side factors and to identify the key influencing factors. Given that the differences inresource endowments and supply- demand characteristics in different regions, this framework is applied to the YiwuNingbo container freight corridor. The results show that: ignoring life cycle and secondary activities of transportationchain, especially the former, would underestimate the energy consumption, which would lead to inaccurate evaluationof the contribution of each energy-saving strategy; the direct energy consumption of road transportation for embodiedenergy consumption elasticity is 0.67, which is much higher than that of other influencing factors of the supply- sideand demand-side, and it should be given the top priority for freight transportation energy-saving in the short-/mediumterm; under the current conditions, the energy-saving effect of road-to-rail strategy is limited if without other strategies,and the energy-saving strategies for direct energy consumption are recommended in the short-/medium-term, and theenergy-saving strategies for indirect energy consumption are recommended in the medium-/long-term.
Keywords:integrated transportation,freight transportation energy consumption,energy consumption measurement  energy-saving potential,supply-side,demand-side,
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《交通运输系统工程与信息》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《交通运输系统工程与信息》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号