首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

铁路旅客列车德国小蠊密度监测方法的调查研究
引用本文:刘小闪.铁路旅客列车德国小蠊密度监测方法的调查研究[J].铁道劳动安全卫生与环保,2014(1):37-39.
作者姓名:刘小闪
作者单位:中国铁道科学研究院节能环保劳卫研究所,北京100081
摘    要:目的 比较铁路旅客列车蟑螂各种监测方法之间的实效性,为蟑螂密度调查提供科学依据.方法 采用目前常用的蟑螂密度监测方法目测法、粘捕法、药激法在同一现场进行对比试验.结果 目测法、药激法、粘捕法测定蟑螂密度,阳性率分别为4.43%、1.44%、13.69%.密度指数分别为2.94只/车厢、3.98只/车厢、5.94只/车厢,对3种方法阳性率进行统计学检验,x2=398.77,P<0.05,差异有显著性意义,其中粘捕法检出效果最高.结论 3种方法有各自特点,应当结合监测时间、监测目的,选取合适的方法进行铁路站车蟑螂的监测.

关 键 词:德国小蠊  密度监测方法

The Investigation of the Density-monitoring Methods for Blattella Germanica in Passenger Train
LIU Xiaoshan.The Investigation of the Density-monitoring Methods for Blattella Germanica in Passenger Train[J].Railway Occupational Safety Health & Environmental Protection,2014(1):37-39.
Authors:LIU Xiaoshan
Institution:LIU Xiaoshan (Energy Saving & Environmental Protection & Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute, China Academy of Railway Sciences, Beijing 100081, China)
Abstract:Objective To verify the practicality and comparability of the methods for monitoring the density of Blattella germanica in Passenger train, and to provide the scientific basis for the investigation of cockroaches density. Methods According to the methods for monitoring the density of cockroaches which were used often at present, and carrying out the contrast experiment at the same place. Results The examined rates of rang estimating, drug arousing and gluing to catch were 4.43% , 1.44% and 13.69% respectively. The density index were 2.94,3.98 and 5.94, Comparing the results of three methods, X2 = 398.77 , P 〈 0. 05. The differences had remarkable significances and the examined rate of gluing to catch was the highest of the three methods. Conclusion It was necessary to take scientific monitor methods for controlling cockroaches.
Keywords:Blattella germanica  density-monitoring methods
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号