| 证明标准--客观真实、法律真实与实体真实 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 陈浩然.证明标准--客观真实、法律真实与实体真实[J].上海交通大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2004,12(1):17-22. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 陈浩然 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 复旦大学法学院,上海,200433 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 诉讼中的证明标准是一个争议颇为激烈的理论问题。本文从比较法的角度，对形成各种证明标准的历史条件和标准环境进行了比较对照，并从诉讼实践的价值取向等角度，对客观真实、法律真实和实体真实的标准加以分析．提出了正当程序的要求之下追求实体真实的必然性，以及强调科学证据与科学证明的必要性等理论观点。
|
| 关 键 词： | 客观真实 法律真实 实体真实 证明标准 诉讼实践 比较法 价值取向 科学证据 科学证明 |
| 文章编号： | 1008-7095(2004)01-0017-06 |
| 修稿时间： | 2003年10月29 |
The Standards of Proof--Objective Authenticity,Legal Authenticity and Substantial Authenticity |
| |
| CHEN Hao-ran.The Standards of Proof--Objective Authenticity,Legal Authenticity and Substantial Authenticity[J].Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University(Social Science),2004,12(1):17-22. |
| |
| Authors: | CHEN Hao-ran |
| |
| Abstract: | The standards of proof in court proceedings are a highly controversial subject. In the present paper, the author compares, historical environments and legal conditions which produced varied standards of proof. The author also makes an analysis on the standards of objective authenticity, legal authenticity and substantial authenticity under value orientations in litigant practice. Thus,the author proposes the necessity to pursue substantial authenticity on the basis of due process, and he also emphasizes the indispensability of scientific evidence. |
| |
| Keywords: | standards of proof objective authenticity legal authenticity substantial authenticity scientific evidence |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
