首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

平衡悬架钢板弹簧离散梁单元模拟方法误差修正
引用本文:董忠红,;朱园,;倪凤英.平衡悬架钢板弹簧离散梁单元模拟方法误差修正[J].兰州铁道学院学报,2014(3):6-10.
作者姓名:董忠红  ;朱园  ;倪凤英
作者单位:[1]长安大学道路施工与装备教育部重点实验室,陕西西安710064; [2]长安大学汽车学院,陕西西安710064
基金项目:国家自然科学基金(51008030);中央高校基本科研业务费专项项目(CHD2010JC063,CHD2011ZD001)
摘    要:为研究平衡悬架钢板弹簧离散梁单元模拟模型的精度,建立了3种典型重载车辆常用平衡悬架模型.同时采用平衡悬架刚度经典计算方法,计算3种悬架的刚度.对比分析离散梁单元法和经典方法垂向刚度计算结果,发现离散梁单元法模拟结果较理论计算结果大55%左右.分析误差产生原因,提出误差修正方法.修正之后的模型垂向刚度与理论刚度相比,偏差在5%以内.该修正方法为离散梁单元建模的推广应用,同时也为建立符合实际力学性能的钢板弹簧模型提供了条件.

关 键 词:汽车工程  钢板弹簧  离散梁单元法  误差  修正

Error Correction for the Discrete Beam Model of the Balance Suspension Leaf Spring
Institution:DONG Zhong-hong, ZHU Yuan, NI Feng-ying (1, Key Laboratory of Highway Construction Technology and Equipment of the Ministry of Education, Chang'an University, Xi'an 710064, China; 2. School of Automobile, Chang'an University, Xi'an 710064,China)
Abstract:To study the precision of the discrete beam model of the balance suspension leaf spring, the models of three kinds of heavy vehicle balance suspension are set up.And the stiffness of the balance suspensions is also calculated in the classic method.Compared the calculation results of discrete beam models and classic method,it is found that the stiffness getting from discrete beam models is about 55% larger than the theoretical stiffness.After analyzing the cause of error,a correctional method is proposed.The difference between the stiffness getting from correctional discrete beam models and calculation result of classical method is less than 5%.The correction method is significant for promoting the wide use of the discrete beam method,and ensures to establish a reasonable model which conforms to the realistic mechanical properties of leaf spring.
Keywords:automotive engineering  leaf spring  discrete beam method  error  correction
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号