首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Sulphur abatement globally in maritime shipping
Institution:1. Sintef Ocean AS (MARINTEK), Trondheim, Norway;2. Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway;3. Norwegian School of Economics (NHH and SNF), Bergen, Norway;1. Department of Business and Management Science, Norwegian School of Economics (NHH), Helleveien 30, 5045 Bergen, Norway;2. Kedge Business School, 680 Cours de la Libération, 33405 Talence, France;3. LEMNA, University of Nantes, BP 52231 Chemin de la Censive du Tertre, 44322 Nantes Cedex 3, France;4. INED, Paris, France;1. Transport Research Institute, Edinburgh Napier University, Merchiston Campus, EH10 5DT Edinburgh, United Kingdom;2. Logistics and Transport Research Group, Department of Business Administration, School of Business, Economics and Law at University of Gothenburg, P.O. Box 610, SE 405 30 Göteborg, Sweden;1. Norwegian Marine Technology Research Institute (MARINTEK), Trondheim, Norway;2. United European Car Carriers (UECC), Oslo, Norway;3. Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway
Abstract:In 2016, the International Maritime Organization (IMO) decided on global regulations to reduce sulphur emissions to air from maritime shipping starting 2020. The regulation implies that ships can continue to use residual fuels with a high sulphur content, such as heavy fuel oil (HFO), if they employ scrubbers to desulphurise the exhaust gases. Alternatively, they can use fuels with less than 0.5% sulphur, such as desulphurised HFO, distillates (diesel) or liquefied natural gas (LNG). The options of lighter fuels and desulphurisation entail costs, including higher energy consumption at refineries, and the present study identifies and compares compliance options as a function of ship type and operational patterns.The results indicate distillates as an attractive option for smaller vessels, while scrubbers will be an attractive option for larger vessels. For all vessels, apart from the largest fuel consumers, residual fuels desulphurised to less than 0.5% sulphur are also a competing abatement option. Moreover, we analyse the interaction between global SOX reductions and CO2 (and fuel consumption), and the results indicate that the higher fuel cost for distillates will motivate shippers to lower speeds, which will offset the increased CO2 emissions at the refineries. Scrubbers, in contrast, will raise speeds and CO2 emissions.
Keywords:Shipping and the environment  Abatement cost and options  Marine fuels  MARPOL  IMO
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号