| 证明还是反驳--对辩护人责任的本体论思考 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 翟建,张培鸿. 证明还是反驳--对辩护人责任的本体论思考[J]. 上海交通大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2004, 12(2): 15-18 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 翟建 张培鸿 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 上海翟建律师事务所,上海,200030;上海翟建律师事务所,上海,200030 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 刑事辩护律师的责任应当是维护当事人的合法权益。在刑事辩护活动中。提出无罪或罪轻的证据不应当是辩护人的责任。辩护律师不负有证明其当事人无罪的举证责任,而应当主要以反驳方式,指出控方证据的瑕疵,推翻其指控的事实,令指控不能成立。
|
| 关 键 词： | 刑事辩护 证明责任 反驳 |
| 文章编号： | 1008-7095(2004)02-0015-04 |
| 修稿时间： | 2003-12-18 |
To Prove or to Rebut |
| |
| ZHAI Jian,ZHANG Pei hong. To Prove or to Rebut[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University(Social Science), 2004, 12(2): 15-18 |
| |
| Authors: | ZHAI Jian ZHANG Pei hong |
| |
| Abstract: | The responsibility of criminal counsels should be to safeguard the legal rights of their clients. In criminal cases, presenting evidence of innocence or misdemeanor should not be the responsibility of the counsels. The counsels should, in a way of rebuttal, point out the flaws in the evidence presented by the accuser, overthrow the fact accused and thus invalidate the accusation. |
| |
| Keywords: | criminal vindication responsibility of proving rebuttal |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
