Computational comparisons of algorithms for general asymmetric traffic equilibrium problems with fixed and elastic demands |
| |
| Affiliation: | 1. Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Urban ITS, Southeast University, Southeast University Road #2, Nanjing, 211189, China;2. Jiangsu Province Collaborative Innovation Center of Modern Urban Traffic Technologies, Southeast University, Southeast University Road #2, Nanjing, 211189, China;3. School of Transportation, Southeast University, Southeast University Road #2, Nanjing, 211189, China;4. Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117576, Singapore;1. University of Salerno, via Giovanni Paolo II n.132, Fisciano (SA) 84125, Italy;2. University of Genoa, via Montallegro n.1, Genoa 16145, Italy |
| |
| Abstract: | In this note we compare the computational efficiency of projection and relaxation methods for the solution of the asymmetric traffic equilibrium problem with elastic demands with their computational efficiency for the fixed demand problem. In particular, we tested networks with three different classes of travel cost and travel disutility functions. Our experiments suggest that the form of the travel cost and disutility functions affects not only the relative efficiencies of these two methods but also their overall efficiencies. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
| 本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录！ |
|
