首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

貌似而神离——李健吾、沈从文文学批评比较论
引用本文:文学武.貌似而神离——李健吾、沈从文文学批评比较论[J].上海交通大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2012,20(3):86-93,102.
作者姓名:文学武
作者单位:上海交通大学人文学院,上海,200240
基金项目:教育部人文社科规划基金项目
摘    要:由于尊崇自由主义文艺观和同属京派文人阵营的缘故,李健吾和沈从文的文学批评在一些方面有着相似的地方,比如在总体上带有印象批评的特点,重视感悟和直觉。但这只是表层的现象,应该看到他们的文学批评在内在精神上更有实质的差别,他们在审美的现代性意识以及现代批评范式、批评态度等很多地方均表现出不同的特征,可谓貌似而神离。而这些方面的差异也决定了李健吾和沈从文的批评在中国现代文学批评史上的价值、地位不可同日而语。

关 键 词:李健吾  沈从文  印象批评  审美现代性  批评范式

Similar in Appearance But Different in Essence——Comparison of Literary Criticisms between Li Jian-wu and Shen Cong-wen
WEN Xue-wu.Similar in Appearance But Different in Essence——Comparison of Literary Criticisms between Li Jian-wu and Shen Cong-wen[J].Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University(Social Science),2012,20(3):86-93,102.
Authors:WEN Xue-wu
Institution:WEN Xue-wu School of Humanities,Shanghai Jiao Tong University,Shanghai 200240,China
Abstract:There existed some similarities between Li Jian-wu and Shen Cong-wen in their literary criticism because both of them respected liberalism and both belonged to Jingpai scholars.For example,their criticism had the characteristics of impressionism,and valueed on perception and intuition.However,this was just superficial phenomenon.There were essential spiritual differences between their literary criticisms,as they showed different characteristics in the consciousness of aesthetic modernity,modern critical paradigm,and critical attitude.They looked similar in appearance but were different in essence.So,due to these differences,Shen Cong-wen cannot be compared in the same breath with Li Jian-wu concerning their influences in the history of Chinese modern literary criticism.
Keywords:Li Jian-wu  Shen Cong-wen  impression criticism  aesthetic modernity  critical paradigm
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号