首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Methods for pre-processing smartcard data to improve data quality
Institution:1. Singapore-MIT Alliance for Research and Technology, Singapore 138602, Singapore;2. Public Transport Quality, Land Transport Authority, Singapore 575701, Singapore;1. Department of Petroleum Engineering, China University of Petroleum (East China), 266580 Qingdao, China;2. Chongqing University of Science and Technology, 401331 Chongqing, China;1. Ningbo Collaborative Innovation Center of Nonlinear Harzard System of Ocean and Atmosphere and Faculty of Science, Ningbo University, Ningbo, 315211, China;2. Department of Mathematics, China University of Mining and Technology, Beijing 100083, China;3. Shanghai Key Laboratory of Trustworthy Computing, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China;1. Selcuk University, Faculty of Science, Department of Chemistry, 42075 Konya, Turkey;2. Selcuk University, Faculty of Science, Department of Biochemistry, 42075 Konya, Turkey;3. Selcuk University, Advanced Research Technology and Application Center, 42075 Konya, Turkey;1. School of Civil Engineering, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia;2. School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia
Abstract:In recent years smartcards have been implemented in many transit systems around the world as a means by which passengers pay for travel. In addition to allowing speedier boardings there are many secondary benefits of smartcard systems including better understanding of travel patterns and behaviour of travellers. Such research is dependent on the smartcard correctly recording the boarding stop, and where available the alighting stop. It is also dependent on the smartcard system correctly aggregating individual rides into trips.This paper identifies causes for why smartcard systems may not correctly record such information. The first contribution of the paper is to propose a set of rules to aggregate individual rides into a single trip. This is critical in the research of activity based modelling as well as for correctly charging the passenger. The second contribution of the paper is to provide an approach to identify erroneous tap-out data, either caused by system problems or by the user. An approach to detecting this phenomenon is provided. The output from this analysis is then used to identify faulty vehicles or data supply using the “comparison against peers approach”. This third contribution of the paper identifies where transit agencies and operators should target resources to improve performance of their Automatic Vehicle Location systems. This method could also be used to identify users who appear to be tapping out too early.The approaches are tested using smartcard data from the Singapore public transport network from one week in April 2011. The results suggest that approximately 7.7% of all smartcard rides recorded the passenger as alighting one stop before the bus stop that they most probably alighted at. A further 0.7% of smartcard rides recorded the passenger as alighting more than one stop before the bus stop that they most probably alighted at. There was no evidence that smartcards overestimated the distance travelled by the passenger.
Keywords:Smartcard  Automatic Fare Collection system  Automatic Vehicle Location system  Public transport travel patterns  Data quality  Trip identification
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号