Generalised time and the problem of equity in transport studies

The generalised time expenditure on travel,g _t, may be defined asg _t =t +m/λ where t is the amount of time spent, m is the amount of money spent, and λ is the value of time. Generalised time is expressed in units of time, unlikeg _c, the generalised cost (g _c =m + λt), which measures the same quantities in units of money. Data on all trips from two studies are analysed to show that, as household income increases, the money spent per mile travelled increases, but the time spent per mile decreases. The use of generalised time gives a different picture of the relationship between income and the total time and money spent on travel to that given by the use of generalised cost. The choice between using generalised time and generalised cost in evaluation is fundamentally a choice between assuming that the marginal utility of time and that of money is constant. The procedures at present recommended by the Department of the Environment in U.K. have elements of both assumptions, with some loss of consistency. There are some a priori reasons for expecting constant marginal utility of time to be a more plausible assumption than constant marginal utility of money. Time is, by its nature, equitably and unalterably distributed, not subject to the accidents of inheritance, theft, chance, inflation, social system or government decree. Everybody starts off with 24 hours a day. Although the amount of “free” time varies, of course, it probably varies within a much smaller range than the amount of wealth, certainly for the employed population. In allocating time between various activities, the use of words likespend, save, waste, lose, gain, and so on is a reflection of how deeply rooted in language and thought is the concept of time as a fundamental currency. This approach is strengthened by recent developments in two areas where generalised cost has been found to be a useful tool of analysis — (a) in explaining and predicting the behaviour of travellers, and (b) in evaluating the social costs and benefits arising from transport projects. Only non-working time will be considered here. It is suggested that in some circumstances generalised time would allowbehaviourally correct relationships between non-working time and money to be used in evaluation. This paper — which is a revised version of “A Hypothesis of Constant Time Outlay on Travel” (Paper F29: Planning and Transport Research and Computation Ltd. Sussex, June 1973) — is based upon work carried out with the financial support of the Social Science Research Council.