多线路公交停靠站停靠组织研究

针对多线路公交停靠站公交车辆进出站排队现象严重,站点延误大,运行效率低等问题,分析了不同停靠组织形式和不同主辅站设置类型对公交运营效率的影响。运用Vissim对3泊位直线式和港湾式公交停靠站点的顺序停靠组织和不同组合的划线停靠组织分别进行仿真研究,从公交延误、车辆总延误、行程时间以及通过车辆数4个方面对不同停靠组织形式在不同条件下的交通运行效果进行评价,得到不同形式公交停靠站的最佳停靠组织形式;在此基础上,对不同组合型式的6泊位主辅站停靠组织进行仿真评价,得到了最优的主辅站设置类型。仿真结果表明:对3泊位公交停靠站采用直线式停靠站,总延误平均降低38.4%,采用港湾式公交停靠站,总延误平均降低40.6%;对6泊位主辅站采用双港串联设置,总延误降低22.8%。 

A Study of Bus Stops on Multiple Routes

In order to address bus queuing ,stop delay ,low operating efficiency at bus stops on multiple routes , this paper analyses the effects of different stop/parking layouts and combinations of primary and secondary bus stops on bus operation .The linear and bay bus stops with 3 bus berths and different combination of stopping sequence were ana‐lyzed based on Vissim simulation .The effects of different bus stop layouts and dwelling organization on the performance of transit were evaluated from number of bus delay ,total delays ,travel times and bus volumes .The optimal dwelling or‐ganization for different bus stop layout was concluded .Based on these results ,different combination types of primary and secondary bus stops with 6 bus berths were analyzed and evaluated .The optimal form of dwelling organization and prima‐ry secondary combination bus stops were recommended .The simulation result showed the total delay on 3 berths linear bus stop decreased 38 .4% on average ;and a bay bus stop decreased 40 .6% on average;the total delay decreased 22 .8%when 6 berths primary‐secondary bus stop used the tandem double bay layout .