地铁渡线道岔联动及单动控制的故障处置方案比较 |
| |
引用本文: | 叶伟勇.地铁渡线道岔联动及单动控制的故障处置方案比较[J].城市轨道交通研究,2016(12):132-134. |
| |
作者姓名: | 叶伟勇 |
| |
作者单位: | 南京铁道职业技术学院,210031,南京 |
| |
摘 要: | 渡线道岔控制根据信号设备不同有联动控制和单动控制2种方案。从渡线道岔故障后的行车处置出发,对不同控制方案产生的影响进行分析和反思。在“失去表示”故障情况下,两种控制方案的处置方法和安全效率均有较大区别。采用单动控制的方案虽逻辑复杂,但故障处置更为灵活,是较好的控制方案。
|
关 键 词: | 地铁 渡线道岔 联动 单动 故障处置 |
Comparison between Linkage Control and Single-action Control of Subway Crossover Switch in Fault Disposal |
| |
Abstract: | There are two schemes:linkage control and single-action control according to different signal devices.From the aspect of traffic management after a crossover switch fault,the influence of different design schemes is analyzed and introspected.In case of expression loss,there are significant differences between disposal methods in terms of efficiency and security.The single-action control scheme has complex logic,but it is more flexible in processing faults and is therefore considered as a better control scheme. |
| |
Keywords: | subway crossover switch linkage single action fault disposal |
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录! |
|